Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22205574›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2012

Characterisation of the iterative integral parameter identification method.

Paul D Docherty, J Geoffrey Chase, Timothy David

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Variability in Estimated Modelled Insulin Secretion.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Estimating Increased EGP During Stress Response in Critically Ill Patients.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul D DochertyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, PO Box:4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand. paul.docherty@canterbury.ac.nz
J Geoffrey Chase
Timothy David

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parameter identification methods are used to find optimal parameter values to fit models to measured data. The single integral method was defined as a simple and robust parameter identification method. However, the method did not necessarily converge to optimum parameter values. Thus, the iterative integral method (IIM) was developed. IIM will be compared to a proprietary nonlinear-least-squares-based Levenberg-Marquardt parameter identification algorithm using a range of reasonable starting values. Performance is assessed by the rate and accuracy of convergence for an exemplar two parameters insulin pharmacokinetic model, where true values are known a priori. IIM successfully converged to within 1% of the true values in all cases with a median time of 1.23 s (IQR 0.82-1.55 s; range 0.61-3.91 s). The nonlinear-least-squares method failed to converge in 22% of the cases and had a median (successful) convergence time of 3.29 s (IQR 2.04-4.89 s; range 0.42-44.9 s). IIM is a stable and relatively quick parameter identification method that can be applied in a broad variety of model configurations. In contrast to most established methods, IIM is not susceptible to local minima and is thus, starting point and operator independent.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalAlgorithmsHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin ResistanceModels, BiologicalHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.