Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22205541›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2012

Risk stratification of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis with ascites based on classification and regression tree analysis.

Ke-Qing Shi, Yu-Chen Fan, Li Ying, Xian-Feng Lin, Mei Song, Ling-Fei Li, Xie-Yan Yu, Yong-Ping Chen, Ming-Hua Zheng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Predictors of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Patients with Cirrhotic Ascites.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ke-Qing ShiDepartment of Infection and Liver Diseases, Liver Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, No. 2 Fuxue Lane, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Yu-Chen Fan
Li Ying
Xian-Feng Lin
Mei Song
Ling-Fei Li
Xie-Yan Yu
Yong-Ping Chen
Ming-Hua Zheng
Wenzhou Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk stratification for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in patients with cirrhosis and ascites helps guide care. Existing prediction models, such as end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, are accurate but controversial in clinical practice. We developed and validated a practical user-friendly bedside tool for SBP risk stratification of patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis, a model was developed for prediction of SBP in cirrhosis with ascites. The CART model was derived on data collected from 676 patients admitted from January 2007 to December 2009 retrospectively, and then was prospectively tested in another independent 198 inpatients between January 2010 and December 2010. The accuracy of CART model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The performance of the model was further validated by comparing its predictive accuracy with that of the MELD score. Furthermore, the model was used to stratify SBP among patients with MELD scores under 15. CART analysis identified four variables for prediction of SBP: creatinine, total bilirubin, prothrombin time and white blood cell count, and three risk groups: low (2.0%), intermediate (27.5-33.3%) and high (60.6-86.4%) risk. The accuracy of CART model (0.881) exceeded that of MELD (0.791). Subjects in the intermediate risk and high risk groups had 22.21-fold (95% confident interval (CI), 9.98-49.45) and 173.50-fold (95% CI, 77.68-634.33) increased risk of SBP, respectively, comparing with the low risk group. Similar results were found when this risk stratification was applied to the validation cohort. Cirrhotic patients with ascites at low, intermediate, and high risk for SBP can be easily identified using CART model, which provides clinicians with a validated, practical bedside tool for SBP risk stratification.

Indexed as

AscitesBacterial InfectionsChinaCohort StudiesDemographyFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedPeritonitisRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID22205541
OpenAlexW2070796164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.