ArticleParasitology research2012
Multiple effects of pepstatin A on Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigote forms.
Article in Parasitology research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding the anti-Trypanosoma cruzi action of HIV peptidase inhibitors using epimastigotes as a model.PloS one · 2014Article
- Aspartic peptidases of human pathogenic trypanosomatids: perspectives and trends for chemotherapy.Current medicinal chemistry · 2013Review
- Calpains: potential targets for alternative chemotherapeutic intervention against human pathogenic trypanosomatids.Current medicinal chemistry · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herein, we have aimed to explore the effects of pepstatin A, a powerful aspartic protease inhibitor, on Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiologic agent of Chagas' disease. Pepstatin A arrested the proliferation of epimastigotes of T. cruzi (clone Dm28c, TcI lineage), in both dose- and time-dependent manner. The IC(50) value was calculated to be 36.2 μM after 96 h of parasite-drug contact. The parasite treatment with pepstatin A resulted in significant morphological alterations, including parasites becoming round in shape, reduction (≈25%) of the parasite size, and parasites presenting parts or the whole flagellum detached from the cell body. Cell lysis was not observed, resulting in a trypanostatic effect. The treatment of different T. cruzi strains, belonging to distinct phylogenetic lineages, with pepstatin A at 36.2 μM resulted in growth inhibition as follows: 28% to Y (TcII), 45% to CL Brener (TcII), 45.4% to 4167 (Z3), and 26.4% to 3663 (Z3) strains. The hydrolysis of a cathepsin D fluorogenic substrate (7-methoxycoumarin-4-acetyl-Gly-Lys-Pro-Ile-Leu-Phe-Phe-Arg-Leu-Lys(DNP)-D: -Arg-amide) by T. cruzi epimastigote extract was inhibited (≈65%) by pepstatin A at 10 μM, suggesting that an aspartic protease may be the intracellular target of this inhibitor. Curiously, pepstatin A induced an increase of 54% and 98%, respectively, in the surface expression of gp63- and calpain-related molecules in epimastigotes, but not in the cruzipain level, as well as stimulated the epimastigote-to-trypomastigote differentiation in a dose-dependent manner. However, approximately 45% of the trypomastigotes had their flagellum detached from the cell body. These results contribute to understand the possible role of aspartic proteases in the physiology of T. cruzi cells, adding new in vitro insights into the possibility of exploiting aspartic protease as promising targets to treat Chagas' disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.