Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22205031›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2012

Population dynamics of naive and memory CD8 T cell responses after antigen stimulations in vivo.

Matthew D Martin, Stephanie A Condotta, John T Harty, Vladimir P Badovinac

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dietary restriction reprograms CD8Nature metabolism · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CD115Cell reports · 2023
    Article
  6. Ketolysis drives CD8Immunity · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Monocyte-Derived CD11cCell host & microbe · 2019
    Article
  11. Aging of Antiviral CD8Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Defining Memory CD8 T Cell.Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew D MartinDepartment of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Stephanie A Condotta
John T Harty
Vladimir P Badovinac
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Regulation of primary and secondary CD4 and CD8 T cell memoryR37AI042767 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HARTY, JOHN T · 2008 to 2017
$4.7M
T resident memory in the lungR01AI042767 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HARTY, JOHN T · 1998 to 2023
$4.4M
Presentation of Listeria antigens to CD8+ T cellsR01AI046653 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HARTY, JOHN T · 2001 to 2010
$3.9M
Regulation of T cell homeostasis by IFN-gammaR01AI050073 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HARTY, JOHN T · 2001 to 2011
$3.5M
CTL pathogenesis after infection of vaccinated hostR01AI059752 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HARTY, JOHN T · 2005 to 2009
$1.8M
Memory CD8 T Cell Responses After Multiple Antigen EncountersR01AI083286 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BADOVINAC, VLADIMIR P · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
CD8+ T Cell effector mechanisms against L. monocytogenesR21AI042767 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HARTY, JOHN T. · 2002 to 2002
$331k
NIAID NIH HHS AI42767NIAID NIH HHS AI46653NIAID NIH HHS AI50073NIAID NIH HHS AI59752NIAID NIH HHS AI83286NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI042767NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI046653NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI050073NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI059752NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI083286NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI042767NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI042767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent to which the progeny of one primary memory CD8 T cell differs from the progeny of one naive CD8 T cell of the same specificity remains an unresolved question. To explore cell-autonomous functional differences between naive and memory CD8 T cells that are not influenced by differences in the priming environment, an experimental model has been developed in which physiological numbers of both populations of cells were cotransferred into naive hosts before Ag stimulation. Interestingly, naive CD8 T cells undergo greater expansion in numbers than do primary memory CD8 T cells after various infections or immunizations. The intrinsic ability of one naive CD8 T cell to give rise to more effector CD8 T cells than one memory CD8 T cell is independent of the number and quality of primary memory CD8 T cells present in vivo. The sustained proliferation of newly activated naive CD8 T cells contributed to their greater magnitude of expansion. Additionally, longitudinal analyses of primary and secondary CD8 T cell responses revealed that on a per-cell basis naive CD8 T cells generate higher numbers of long-lived memory cells than do primary memory CD8 T cells. This enhanced "memory generation potential" of responding naive CD8 T cells occurred despite the delayed contraction of secondary CD8 T cell responses. Taken together, the data in this study revealed previously unappreciated differences between naive and memory CD8 T cells and will help further define the functional potential for both cell types.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigensCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell LineageCell ProliferationImmunologic MemoryLymphocyte ActivationMiceAntigens

Identifiers

PMID22205031
PMCPMC3262935
OpenAlexW1669380462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.