ArticleJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2011
Cohnella soli sp. nov. and Cohnella suwonensis sp. nov. Isolated from soil samples in Korea.
Article in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Description of Cohnella rhizoplanae sp. nov., isolated from the root surface of soybean (Glycine max).Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2024Article
- Cohnella cholangitidis sp. nov., a novel species of the genus Cohnella isolated from a clinical specimen in Korea.Archives of microbiology · 2021Article
- Cohnella pontilimi sp. nov., isolated from tidal-flat mud.Archives of microbiology · 2021Article
- Airborne bacteria associated with corrosion of mild steel 1010 and aluminum alloy 1100.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two bacterial isolates from soil samples taken in Korea, strains YM2-7(T) and WD2-19(T), were characterized using a polyphasic approach. The cells were strictly aerobic, Gram-positive, motile with peritrichous flagella, and rod-shaped. Both strains formed ellipsoidal bulging positioned subterminal spores. Phylogenetic analysis of their 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed a clear affiliation with the Firmicutes. The 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between YM2-7(T) and WD2-19(T) was 96.5%. Strains YM2-7(T) and WD2-19(T) showed 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities of 93.0-96.5% to type strains of recognized Cohnella species. The G+C contents of the DNA of strains YM2-7(T) and WD2-19(T) were 52.2 and 55.6 mol%, respectively. The major fatty acids of strains YM2-7(T) and WD2-19(T) were anteiso-C15:0 (44.4%), C16:0 (19.2%), and iso-C16:0 (16.8%) and anteiso-C15:0 (46.5%), iso-C16:0 (21.8%), and C16:0 (11.2%), respectively. Both strains contained menaquinone with seven isoprene units (MK-7) as the predominant quinone. Both strains had diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine and lysophosphatidylglycerol as the major polar lipids. Comparative analysis of phenotypic and phylogenetic traits indicated that strains YM2-7(T) and WD2-19(T) represented two novel species of the genus Cohnella. The names Cohnella soli sp. nov. (type strain YM2-7(T) =KACC 13346(T) =NBRC 106486(T)), and Cohnella suwonensis sp. nov. (type strain WD2-19T =KACC 13347(T) =NBRC 106485(T)) are proposed for these organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22203570What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.