Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22203423›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2012

Substantial improvements in large-scale redocking and screening using the novel HYDE scoring function.

Nadine Schneider, Sally Hindle, Gudrun Lange, Robert Klein, Jürgen Albrecht, Hans Briem, Kristin Beyer, Holger Claußen, Marcus Gastreich, Christian Lemmen and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. New Phenylpropanoid fromCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Selene-Ethylenelacticamides andPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Natural Products-Based Drug Design against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro 3CLpro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Discovery of Potent Inhibitors ofACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Identification of a Potent and Selective 5-HTACS chemical neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nadine SchneiderCenter for Bioinformatics, University of Hamburg, Bundesstr. 43, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Sally Hindle
Gudrun Lange
Robert Klein
Jürgen Albrecht
Hans Briem
Kristin Beyer
Holger Claußen
Marcus Gastreich
Christian Lemmen
Matthias Rarey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The HYDE scoring function consistently describes hydrogen bonding, the hydrophobic effect and desolvation. It relies on HYdration and DEsolvation terms which are calibrated using octanol/water partition coefficients of small molecules. We do not use affinity data for calibration, therefore HYDE is generally applicable to all protein targets. HYDE reflects the Gibbs free energy of binding while only considering the essential interactions of protein-ligand complexes. The greatest benefit of HYDE is that it yields a very intuitive atom-based score, which can be mapped onto the ligand and protein atoms. This allows the direct visualization of the score and consequently facilitates analysis of protein-ligand complexes during the lead optimization process. In this study, we validated our new scoring function by applying it in large-scale docking experiments. We could successfully predict the correct binding mode in 93% of complexes in redocking calculations on the Astex diverse set, while our performance in virtual screening experiments using the DUD dataset showed significant enrichment values with a mean AUC of 0.77 across all protein targets with little or no structural defects. As part of these studies, we also carried out a very detailed analysis of the data that revealed interesting pitfalls, which we highlight here and which should be addressed in future benchmark datasets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsThermodynamicsBinding SitesHydrogen BondingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLigandsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProteinsWaterLigandsProteinsWater

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.