Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22201808›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition)2012

LINEs, SINEs and other retroelements: do birds of a feather flock together?

Astrid M Roy-Engel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Whole-genome expression analysis of mammalian-wide interspersed repeat elements in human cell lines.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Astrid M Roy-EngelTulane University, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane Cancer Center, SL-66 1430 Tulane Ave., New Orleans, LA 70112. aengel@tulane.edu

Funding

UNCOVERING THE MECHANISMS OF OSTEOSARCOMA METASTASIS SUPPRESSION BY MTBPP20RR020152 · NCRR · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI DEININGER, PRESCOTT L. · 2004 to 2011
$17.0M
Mentoring a Cancer Genetics ProgramP20GM103518 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI DEININGER, PRESCOTT L. · 2012 to 2013
$4.3M
Regulatory effects of LINE components on SINE mobilizationR01GM079709 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI ENGEL, ASTRID M · 2008 to 2012
$1.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020152NCRR NIH HHS P20RR020152NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103518NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079709NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM079709A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile elements account for almost half of the mass of the human genome. Only the retroelements from the non-LTR (long terminal repeat) retrotransposon family, which include the LINE-1 (L1) and its non-autonomous partners, are currently active and contributing to new insertions. Although these elements seem to share the same basic amplification mechanism, the activity and success of the different types of retroelements varies. For example, Alu-induced mutagenesis is responsible for the majority of the documented instances of human disease induced by insertion of retroelements. Using copy number in mammals as an indicator, some SINEs have been vastly more successful than other retroelements, such as the retropseudogenes and even L1, likely due to differences in post-insertion selection and ability to overcome cellular controls. SINE and LINE integration can be differentially influenced by cellular factors, indicating some differences between in their amplification mechanisms. We focus on the known aspects of this group of retroelements and highlight their similarities and differences that may significantly influence their biological impact.

Indexed as

Long Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsShort Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsHumans

Identifiers

PMID22201808
PMCPMC3364521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.