ReviewFrontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition)2012
Mitotic checkpoint control and chromatin remodeling.
Review in Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- BUB signaling in cancer and molecular insights into targeted therapies.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Microtubules in Polyomavirus Infection.Viruses · 2020Review
- Overexpression of Fbxo6 inactivates spindle checkpoint by interacting with Mad2 and BubR1.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2018Article
- Cellular and molecular characterization of human cardiac stem cells reveals key features essential for their function and safety.Stem cells and development · 2015Article
- Chromatin Memory in the Development of Human Cancers.Gene technology · 2014Article
- The dynamics of signal amplification by macromolecular assemblies for the control of chromosome segregation.Frontiers in physiology · 2014Review
- Impact of EBV essential nuclear protein EBNA-3C on B-cell proliferation and apoptosis.Future microbiology · 2013Review
- Interaction of PTPIP51 with Tubulin, CGI-99 and Nuf2 During Cell Cycle Progression.Biomolecules · 2012Article
- In vitro evaluation of ESE-15-ol, an estradiol analogue with nanomolar antimitotic and carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In order to maintain chromosomal stability during cell division, eukaryotic cells have evolved a number of surveillance mechanisms termed checkpoints. These checkpoints monitor the completion of essential molecular and cellular processes of one stage before entering another. The spindle checkpoint watches the bi-orientation attachment of spindle microtubules to all condensed chromosomes before initiation of nuclear division during mitosis. Histones are subject to a number of post-translational modifications during the cell cycle, which may in turn modify or facilitate cell cycle progression. Recent studies suggest that mitotic proteins including Bub1 and Sgo1 that are involved in the spindle checkpoint also play a major role in the regulation of histone modifications and chromatin remodeling. This mini-review summarizes emerging information about the new role of spindle checkpoint proteins in chromatin remodeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.