ReviewOncology nursing forum2012
Physician, patient, and contextual factors affecting treatment decisions in older adults with cancer and models of decision making: a literature review.
Review in Oncology nursing forum, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.
- A mixed methods systematic review of cancer treatment decision-making in vulnerable populations.Patient education and counseling · 2026Pooled it
- Utilisation of endocrine therapy for cancer in Indigenous peoples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Proposal for capturing patient experience through extended value frameworks of health technologies.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2021Pooled it
- Older women's experience with breast cancer treatment: A systematic review of qualitative literature.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- How acceptable is paternalism? A survey-based study of clinician and nonclinician opinions on paternalistic decision making.AJOB empirical bioethicsTrial
- Closing the gap of older adult recruitment to cancer clinical trials: a scoping review.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Association of comorbidity burden with initial treatment allocation in older women with gynecologic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Intertemporal Decision-Making Ability in Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Concept Analysis.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
- Article
- Survival by Treatment Recommendation and Receipt Among Older Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Navigating advanced lung cancer care, patient-physician alliance, cancer stigma, and psychosocial support in Asia-Pacific: perspectives from patients, caregivers, and physicians.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Exploring How Values of Colorectal Cancer Patients and their Caregivers Influence Treatment Decision-Making.The patient · 2025Article
- Considerations to forgo systemic treatment in patients with advanced esophageal or gastric cancer: A real-world evidence study.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Associations between physicians' personal preferences for end-of-life decisions and their own clinical practice: PROPEL survey study in Europe, North America, and Australia.Palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Utilization of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation among patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in California: a population-based linked dataset study.Haematologica · 2025Article
- Decision-Making About Fertility Preservation After Cancer Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study of Patients' Experiences and Perspectives.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
- Factors Guiding Clinical Decision-Making in Genitourinary Oncology.Cancer medicine · 2024Review
- Unravelling Low-Value Care Decision-Making: Residents' Perspectives on the Influence of Contextual Factors.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Patient perceptions of altering chemotherapy treatment due to peripheral neuropathy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PURPOSE/
objectivesTo review physician, patient, and contextual factors that affect treatment decision making in older adults diagnosed with cancer, and to relate those factors to theoretical models of decision making. DATA SOURCES: PubMed (1966 to April 2010), PsycINFO (1967 to April 2010) and CINAHL® (1982 to April 2010) databases were searched to access relevant medical, psychological, and nursing literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: Physician factors in treatment decisions included physician's personal beliefs and values, medical expertise, practice type, perception of lowered life expectancy, medical factors, power, and communication style. Patient factors included personal beliefs and values, ethnicity, decisional control preferences, previous health-related experience, perception of the decision-making process, and personal factors. Contextual factors included availability of caregiver, insurance, financial status, and geographical barrier.
conclusionsA diverse group of factors were identified, which are likely to form a unique framework to understand clinical decision making and plan future investigations in older adult patient populations. Using longitudinal and prospective designs to examine the real-time interplay of patient, physician, and contextual factors will enable a better understanding of how those divergent factors influence actual treatment decisions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses can advocate autonomous (patient-driven), shared, or family-controlled treatment decisions, depending on an older patient's decisional role preference. Nurses can support patient autonomy during treatment decision making by coaching patients to engage in discussion of various evidence-based treatment options and a comprehensive discussion of the probability of success for each option with specialist providers. Oncology nurses may be able to promote treatment decisions that are consistent with a patient's personal preferences and values, with strong consideration of the patient's personal contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.