Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22201655›Full record

ArticleOncology nursing forum2012

The interaction of perceived risk and benefits and the relationship to predicting mammography adherence in African American women.

Alecia Malin Fair, Patrick O Monahan, Kathleen Russell, Qianqian Zhao, Victoria L Champion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alecia Malin FairResearch Support Services at Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical Translational Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. alecia.fair@vanderbilt.edu
Patrick O Monahan
Kathleen Russell
Qianqian Zhao
Victoria L Champion
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

COMMUNITY INTERVENTION TO INCREASE MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENINGR01CA077736 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA L · 1999 to 2003
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA077736NCI NIH HHS R01 CA77736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectivesTo test the interaction of perceived risk and benefits and how they impact stage of mammography readiness and adherence.

designCross-sectional study.

settingCommunity gathering centers and healthcare clinics across Indiana. SAMPLE: 299 African American women who had not had a mammogram in more than 18 months.

methodsIn-person interviews were used to collect data on sociodemographics, health belief variables, and stage of readiness to undertake mammography screening. Four categories were created to measure the combined magnitude of high or low levels of perceived risk and benefit, with health belief variables linked to modified mammography screening behavior. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Perceived risks and benefits, stage of readiness, and mammography adherence.

findingsThe lowest rate of mammography adherence was in women with a high perceived risk and low perceived benefit toward mammography adherence (26%). The highest rate of adherence was in women with a high perceived benefit and low perceived risk (46%). Differences in mammography adherence were statistically significant between the groups (p = 0.009).

conclusionsThe interaction of high perceived risk and low perceived benefits impacted readiness to undergo screening mammography. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Reducing disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and survival requires timely and efficient mammography adherence. African American medically underserved women with high perceived risk and low perceived benefits exhibited a reluctance to move forward with mammography adherence. Interventions are needed to increase the perception of mammography benefit and to subsequently reduce breast cancer mortality rates in that population.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedAttitude to HealthBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedOncology NursingPatient CompliancePredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID22201655
PMCPMC3721522
OpenAlexW2062812193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.