Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22201342›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2012

HIV-associated neurological disorders: a guide to pharmacotherapy.

Ik L Tan, Justin C McArthur

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. New targets for HIV drug discovery.Drug discovery today · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Endothelins in inflammatory neurological diseases.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ik L TanDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287-7613, USA.
Justin C McArthur
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Therapeutic CoreP30MH075673 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Leah Helane Rubin · 2006 to 2026
$33.2M
NIMH NIH HHS 1P30MH075673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV-1-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) continues to be a common and significant morbidity among individuals infected with HIV. The term HAND encompasses a spectrum of progressively severe CNS involvement, ranging from asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment and minor neurocognitive disorder through to the most severe form of HIV-associated dementia (HAD). While the incidence of HAD has declined significantly with HAART, the milder forms of HAND persist. In addition, HAND now develops in individuals with less advanced immunosuppression. The reasons for the persistence of milder forms of HAND in individuals treated with HAART are not entirely known. There are several hypotheses to explain this phenomenon that include the legacy effect, a failure of antiretroviral agents to reverse neurological damage, poor access of antiretroviral agents to the CNS, chronic systemic immune activation associated with microbial translocation products, sustained CNS inflammation, the improved survival of HIV-seropositive individuals and the possible contribution from aging, amyloid deposition and other co-morbidities. In contrast, the incidence of HIV-associated CNS opportunistic processes including progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, tuberculosis, CNS toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus encephalitis, cryptococcosis and primary CNS lymphoma has declined dramatically with the introduction of HAART. This review briefly summarizes our current understanding of HAND and the pathological mechanisms involved, namely direct injury from HIV-1 and viral proteins, indirect neurotoxicity from proinflammatory cytokines and chronic, sustained immune activation in the CNS. To date, only HAART has been shown to benefit HAND despite numerous controlled trials of adjunctive 'anti-inflammatory' agents. Although HAART has a profound impact on the incidence and severity of HAND, there exists a 'therapeutic gap' as even HAART that is effective at inducing durable virological suppression may only partially reverse HAND. In addition, there may be potential CNS adverse effects of antiretroviral agents. There is an ongoing multicentre clinical trial to investigate the role of the CNS Penetration-Effectiveness index, an indicator of drug permeability and availability in the CNS, to help guide the choice of antiretroviral agents in the treatment of HAND. With recent recommendations for earlier treatment intervention with HAART for HIV-1 infection, it remains to be seen the effects of this on HAND. There is an urgent need to better define the therapeutic guidelines for the prevention and treatment of HAND.

Indexed as

AIDS Dementia ComplexAnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansNervous System DiseasesAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID22201342
OpenAlexW79896692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.