Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22201171›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2012

Genomic impacts of chromosomal inversions in parapatric Drosophila species.

Suzanne E McGaugh, Mohamed A F Noor

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Genetic Differentiation ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The importance of intrinsic postzygotic barriers throughout the speciation process.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Population Genomics on the Fly: Recent Advances in Drosophila.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suzanne E McGaughBiology Department, Duke University, Box 90388, Durham, NC 27708, USA. suzanne.mcgaugh@duke.edu
Mohamed A F Noor

Funding

Fine-scale recombination rate variation within and between Drosophila speciesRC2GM092501 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI COMERON, JOSEP M, JONES, CORBIN D · 2009 to 2010
$1.8M
Fine-scale recombination, variation, divergence, and codon bias in DrosophilaR01GM086445 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KLIMAN, RICHARD M, NOOR, MOHAMED A · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
Genetics of speciation in Drosophila pseudoobscuraR01GM076051 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NOOR, MOHAMED A · 2007 to 2011
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM076051NIGMS NIH HHS GM086445NIGMS NIH HHS GM092501NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076051NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086445NIGMS NIH HHS RC2 GM092501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal inversions impact genetic variation and facilitate speciation in part by reducing recombination in heterokaryotypes. We generated multiple whole-genome shotgun sequences of the parapatric species pair Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis and their sympatric outgroup (Drosophila miranda) and compared the average pairwise differences for neutral sites within, just outside and far outside of the three large inversions. Divergence between D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis is high inside the inversions and in the suppressed recombination regions extending 2.5 Mb outside of inversions, but significantly lower in collinear regions further from the inversions. We observe little evidence of decreased divergence predicted to exist in the centre of inversions, suggesting that gene flow through double crossovers or gene conversion is limited within the inversion, or selection is acting within the inversion to maintain divergence in the face of gene flow. In combination with past studies, we provide evidence that inversions in this system maintain areas of high divergence in the face of hybridization, and have done so for a substantial period of time. The left arm of the X chromosome and chromosome 2 inversions appear to have arisen in the lineage leading to D. persimilis approximately 2 Ma, near the time of the split of D. persimilis-D. pseudoobscura-D. miranda, but likely fixed within D. persimilis much more recently, as diversity within D. persimilis is substantially reduced inside and near these two inversions. We also hypothesize that the inversions in D. persimilis may provide an empirical example of the 'mixed geographical mode' theory of inversion origin and fixation, whereby allopatry and secondary contact both play a role.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectAllelesAnimalsChromosome InversionChromosomes, InsectCrossing Over, GeneticDrosophilaFemaleGene FlowGenetic SpeciationGenetic VariationReproductive IsolationSelection, GeneticSympatryX Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID22201171
PMCPMC3233717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.