Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22201166›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2012

What can patterns of differentiation across plant genomes tell us about adaptation and speciation?

Jared L Strasburg, Natasha A Sherman, Kevin M Wright, Leonie C Moyle, John H Willis, Loren H Rieseberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epigenetic architecture ofEcology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. EST-SSR-based landscape genetics ofEcology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jared L StrasburgDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. jstrasbu@indiana.edu
Natasha A Sherman
Kevin M Wright
Leonie C Moyle
John H Willis
Loren H Rieseberg
Indiana University Bloomington · USDuke University · US

Funding

Demographics and phylogeography of hybrid speciationF32GM072409 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI STRASBURG, JARED L · 2005 to 2007
$118k
NIGMS NIH HHS 5F32GM072409-02NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM072409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome scans have become a common approach to identify genomic signatures of natural selection and reproductive isolation, as well as the genomic bases of ecologically relevant phenotypes, based on patterns of polymorphism and differentiation among populations or species. Here, we review the results of studies taking genome scan approaches in plants, consider the patterns of genomic differentiation documented and their possible causes, discuss the results in light of recent models of genomic differentiation during divergent adaptation and speciation, and consider assumptions and caveats in their interpretation. We find that genomic regions of high divergence generally appear quite small in comparisons of both closely and more distantly related populations, and for the most part, these differentiated regions are spread throughout the genome rather than strongly clustered. Thus, the genome scan approach appears well-suited for identifying genomic regions or even candidate genes that underlie adaptive divergence and/or reproductive barriers. We consider other methodologies that may be used in conjunction with genome scan approaches, and suggest further developments that would be valuable. These include broader use of sequence-based markers of known genomic location, greater attention to sampling strategies to make use of parallel environmental or phenotypic transitions, more integration with approaches such as quantitative trait loci mapping and measures of gene flow across the genome, and additional theoretical and simulation work on processes related to divergent adaptation and speciation.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationGenetic VariationGenome, PlantAdaptation, BiologicalGene FlowGenetics, PopulationGenomicsMagnoliopsidaPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociReproductive IsolationSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID22201166
PMCPMC3233712
OpenAlexW2127167965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.