Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22199413›Full record

ArticleComputational statistics & data analysis2007

A matching algorithm for the distribution of human pancreatic islets.

Dajun Qian, John Kaddis, Joyce C Niland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational statistics & data analysis, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dajun QianDivision of Information Sciences and Administrative and Bioinformatics Coordinating Center for the Islet Cell Resource Center Consortium, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
John Kaddis
Joyce C Niland

Funding

The Human Islet Distribution Coordinating Center (UC4)UC4DK098085 · NIDDK · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI EVANS-MOLINA, CARMELLA, NILAND, JOYCE CAROL · 2012 to 2017
$25.6M
NATIONAL ISLET CELL CONSORTIUM COORDINATING CENTERU42RR017673 · NCRR · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI NILAND, JOYCE CAROL · 2002 to 2008
$18.8M
NCRR NIH HHS U42 RR017673NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK098085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of human pancreatic islet transplantation in a subset of type 1 diabetic patients has led to an increased demand for this tissue in both clinical and basic research, yet the availability of such preparations is limited and the quality highly variable. Under the current process of islet distribution for basic science experimentation nationwide, specialized laboratories attempt to distribute islets to one or more scientists based on a list of known investigators. This Local Decision Making (LDM) process has been found to be ineffective and suboptimal. To alleviate these problems, a computerized Matching Algorithm for Islet Distribution (MAID) was developed to better match the functional, morphological, and quality characteristics of islet preparations to the criteria desired by basic research laboratories, i.e. requesters. The algorithm searches for an optimal combination of requesters using detailed screening, sorting, and search procedures. When applied to a data set of 68 human islet preparations distributed by the Islet Cell Resource (ICR) Center Consortium, MAID reduced the number of requesters that a) did not receive any islets, and b) received mis-matched shipments. These results suggest that MAID is an improved more efficient approach to the centralized distribution of human islets within a consortium setting.

Identifiers

PMID22199413
PMCPMC3243971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.