Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22198342›Full record

ArticleNature methods2011

Visualizing adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing in the Drosophila nervous system.

James E C Jepson, Yiannis A Savva, Kyle A Jay, Robert A Reenan

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Illuminating spatial A-to-I RNA editing signatures within theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular biology of insect sodium channels and pyrethroid resistance.Insect biochemistry and molecular biology · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The ADAR protein family.Genome biology · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James E C JepsonDepartment of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Yiannis A Savva
Kyle A Jay
Robert A Reenan
Brown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Informational recoding by adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing diversifies neuronal proteomes by chemically modifying structured mRNAs. However, techniques for analyzing editing activity on substrates in defined neurons in vivo are lacking. Guided by comparative genomics, here we reverse-engineered a fluorescent reporter sensitive to Drosophila melanogaster adenosine deaminase that acts on RNA (dADAR) activity and alterations in dADAR autoregulation. Using this artificial dADAR substrate, we visualized variable patterns of RNA-editing activity in the Drosophila nervous system between individuals. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of structurally mimicking ADAR substrates as a method to regulate protein expression and, potentially, therapeutically repair mutant mRNAs. Our data suggest variable RNA editing as a credible molecular mechanism for mediating individual-to-individual variation in neuronal physiology and behavior.

Indexed as

RNA EditingAdenosineAdenosine DeaminaseAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsInosineNervous SystemAdenosineAdenosine DeaminaseGreen Fluorescent ProteinsInosine

Identifiers

PMID22198342
OpenAlexW1998684725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.