Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22198208›Full record

ReviewCancer letters2012

Use of the γ-H2AX assay to monitor DNA damage and repair in translational cancer research.

Alesia Ivashkevich, Christophe E Redon, Asako J Nakamura, Roger F Martin, Olga A Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer letters, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 216 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
216citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

216 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

156 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alesia IvashkevichLaboratory of Molecular Radiation Biology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Christophe E Redon
Asako J Nakamura
Roger F Martin
Olga A Martin

Funding

Studies of Histone Functions in Chromatin; H2AX and DNA DSBsZIABC006140 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BONNER, WILLIAM · 2009 to 2015
$7.8M
Studies of Histone Functions in Chromatin; H2AX and DNA DSBsZ01BC006140 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BONNER, WILLIAM · 1996 to 2008
$2.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC006140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formation of γ-H2AX in response to DNA double stranded breaks (DSBs) provides the basis for a sensitive assay of DNA damage in human biopsies. The review focuses on the application of γ-H2AX-based methods to translational studies to monitor the clinical response to DNA targeted therapies such as some forms of chemotherapy, external beam radiotherapy, radionuclide therapy or combinations thereof. The escalating attention on radiation biodosimetry has also highlighted the potential of the assay including renewed efforts to assess the radiosensitivity of prospective radiotherapy patients. Finally the γ-H2AX response has been suggested as a basis for an in vivo imaging modality.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHistonesHumansMolecular ImagingNeoplasmsRadiation DosageRadiation ToleranceBiomarkers, TumorH2AX protein, humanHistones

Identifiers

PMID22198208
PMCPMC3329565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.