Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22198145›Full record

ArticleChromosoma2012

Mutability and mutational spectrum of chromosome transmission fidelity genes.

Peter C Stirling, Matthew J Crisp, Munira A Basrai, Cheryl M Tucker, Maitreya J Dunham, Forrest A Spencer, Philip Hieter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Overexpression screens identify conserved dosage chromosome instability genes in yeast and human cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter C StirlingMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T1Z4.
Matthew J Crisp
Munira A Basrai
Cheryl M Tucker
Maitreya J Dunham
Forrest A Spencer
Philip Hieter
Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre · CANational Cancer Institute · USJohns Hopkins University · USPrinceton University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Spatial Patterning During DevelopmentP50GM071508 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, SUSAN M · 2004 to 2013
$30.6M
Molecular Determinants of Chromosome Transmission and Cell Cycle RegulationZIABC010822 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BASRAI, MUNIRA · 2009 to 2025
$29.2M
TRANSPOSITION OF TN7P01CA016519 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOEKE, JEF D · 1985 to 2010
$21.4M
Genetic Determinants of Genomic Plasticity and Chromosome EvolutionR01GM077456 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SPENCER, FORREST A. · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
Functional Determinants of Chromosome SegregationR01CA158162 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI HIETER, PHILIP A. · 2012 to 2016
$1.1M
CIHR MOP-38096NCI NIH HHS CA016519NCI NIH HHS P01 CA016519NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158162NIGMS NIH HHS GM077456NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071508NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been more than two decades since the original chromosome transmission fidelity (Ctf) screen of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was published. Since that time the spectrum of mutations known to cause Ctf and, more generally, chromosome instability (CIN) has expanded dramatically as a result of systematic screens across yeast mutant arrays. Here we describe a comprehensive summary of the original Ctf genetic screen and the cloning of the remaining complementation groups as efforts to expand our knowledge of the CIN gene repertoire and its mutability in a model eukaryote. At the time of the original screen, it was impossible to predict either the genes and processes that would be overrepresented in a pool of random mutants displaying a Ctf phenotype or what the entire set of genes potentially mutable to Ctf would be. We show that in a collection of 136 randomly selected Ctf mutants, >65% of mutants map to 13 genes, 12 of which are involved in sister chromatid cohesion and/or kinetochore function. Extensive screening of systematic mutant collections has shown that ~350 genes with functions as diverse as RNA processing and proteasomal activity mutate to cause a Ctf phenotype and at least 692 genes are required for faithful chromosome segregation. The enrichment of random Ctf alleles in only 13 of ~350 possible Ctf genes suggests that these genes are more easily mutable to cause genome instability than the others. These observations inform our understanding of recurring CIN mutations in human cancers where presumably random mutations are responsible for initiating the frequently observed CIN phenotype of tumors.

Indexed as

Chromosomal InstabilityAnimalsChromosome SegregationChromosomes, FungalCloning, MolecularDNA-Binding ProteinsGenes, FungalHumansKinetochoresMutationNeoplasmsPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTOF1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID22198145
PMCPMC3350768
OpenAlexW1980417454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.