Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22197913›Full record

ArticleNeurochemistry international2012

Molecular pharmacology of human NMDA receptors.

Maiken Hedegaard, Kasper B Hansen, Karen T Andersen, Hans Bräuner-Osborne, Stephen F Traynelis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurochemistry international, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Design of (Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Ketamine: Neuroprotective or Neurotoxic?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  13. Priming with γ-Aminobutyric Acid againstAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The human NMDA receptor GluN2APharmacology research & perspectives · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maiken HedegaardDepartment of Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Road, Rollins Research Center, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Kasper B Hansen
Karen T Andersen
Hans Bräuner-Osborne
Stephen F Traynelis
Emory University · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Control of Glutamate Receptor FunctionR01NS036654 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYNELIS, STEPHEN F · 1998 to 2018
$3.7M
Mechanism of Action of Novel Subunit-Selective NMDA Receptor ModulatorsR01NS065371 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYNELIS, STEPHEN F · 2009 to 2018
$3.4M
Control of glutamate receptor functionR37NS036654 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYNELIS, STEPHEN F · 2007 to 2013
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS NS036654NINDS NIH HHS NS065371NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS036654NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065371NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS036654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are ionotropic glutamate receptors that mediate excitatory neurotransmission. NMDA receptors are also important drug targets that are implicated in a number of pathophysiological conditions. To facilitate the transition from lead compounds in pre-clinical animal models to drug candidates for human use, it is important to establish whether NMDA receptor ligands have similar properties at rodent and human NMDA receptors. Here, we compare amino acid sequences for human and rat NMDA receptor subunits and discuss inter-species variation in the context of our current knowledge of the relationship between NMDA receptor structure and function. We summarize studies on the biophysical properties of human NMDA receptors and compare these properties to those of rat orthologs. Finally, we provide a comprehensive pharmacological characterization that allows side-by-side comparison of agonists, un-competitive antagonists, GluN2B-selective non-competitive antagonists, and GluN2C/D-selective modulators at recombinant human and rat NMDA receptors. The evaluation of biophysical properties and pharmacological probes acting at different sites on the receptor suggest that the binding sites and conformational changes leading to channel gating in response to agonist binding are highly conserved between human and rat NMDA receptors. In summary, the results of this study suggest that no major detectable differences exist in the pharmacological and functional properties of human and rat NMDA receptors.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLigandsRatsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSpecies SpecificityLigandsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID22197913
PMCPMC3335988
OpenAlexW2041370405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.