ArticleHearing research2012
Test-retest consistency of speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses in typically-developing children.
Article in Hearing research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Speech auditory brainstem response in audiological practice: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Electrophysiological Screening for Children With Suspected Auditory Processing Disorder: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds predicts self-reported speech-in-noise performance.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2013Trial
- Assistive listening devices drive neuroplasticity in children with dyslexia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012Trial
- Frequency-Following Responses for Objective Neurophysiological Monitoring in Pediatric Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: A Proof of Concept Case Study During Non-Invasive Neuromodulation.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of Lateralization, Age, and Sex on Frequency Following Response in Children: Neural Speech Encoding to a 170 ms [da] Stimulus.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neural Delays in Processing Speech in Background Noise Minimized after Short-Term Auditory Training.Biology · 2024Article
- Assessing Auditory Processing in Children with Listening Difficulties: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- A Home-Based Approach to Auditory Brainstem Response Measurement: Proof-of-Concept and Practical Guidelines.Seminars in hearing · 2022Review
- Gender Effects on Binaural Speech Auditory Brainstem Response.The journal of international advanced otology · 2022Article
- Comparing Sound-Field Speech-Auditory Brainstem Response Components between Cochlear Implant Users with Different Speech Recognition in Noise Scores.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2022Article
- Impact of hearing aid noise reduction algorithms on the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Sound-Field Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response in Cochlear-Implant Recipients.Journal of audiology & otology · 2020Article
- Baseline profiles of auditory, vestibular, and visual functions in youth tackle football players.Concussion (London, England) · 2020Article
- The Effects of Random Stimulation Rate on Measurements of Auditory Brainstem Response.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Analyzing the FFR: A tutorial for decoding the richness of auditory function.Hearing research · 2019Review
- Frequency-Following Response with Speech Stimulus: Comparison between Two Methods of Stimulation.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2019Article
- Parameters for Applying the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential with Speech Stimulus: Systematic Review.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2018Review
- Musical Experience, Sensorineural Auditory Processing, and Reading Subskills in Adults.Brain sciences · 2018Article
- An Analysis of The Parameters Used In Speech ABR Assessment Protocols.The journal of international advanced otology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The click-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) is widely used in clinical settings, partly due to its predictability and high test-retest consistency. More recently, the speech-evoked ABR has been used to evaluate subcortical processing of complex signals, allowing for the objective assessment of biological processes underlying auditory function and auditory processing deficits not revealed by responses to clicks. Test-retest reliability of some components of speech-evoked ABRs has been shown for adults and children over the course of months. However, a systematic study of the consistency of the speech-evoked brainstem response in school-age children has not been conducted. In the present study, speech-evoked ABRs were collected from 26 typically-developing children (ages 8-13) at two time points separated by one year. ABRs were collected for /da/ presented in quiet and in a 6-talker babble background noise. Test-retest consistency of response timing, spectral encoding, and signal-to-noise ratio was assessed. Response timing and spectral encoding were highly replicable over the course of one year. The consistency of response timing and spectral encoding found for the speech-evoked ABRs of typically-developing children suggests that the speech-evoked ABR may be a unique tool for research and clinical assessment of auditory function, particularly with respect to auditory-based communication skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.