ArticleCognitive psychology2012
Modeling fan effects on the time course of associative recognition.
Article in Cognitive psychology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A whole-task brain model of associative recognition that accounts for human behavior and neuroimaging data.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Capturing Dynamic Performance in a Cognitive Model: Estimating ACT-R Memory Parameters With the Linear Ballistic Accumulator.Topics in cognitive science · 2022Article
- Three levels at which the user's cognition can be represented in artificial intelligence.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Article
- Article
- Fast and slow errors: Logistic regression to identify patterns in accuracy-response time relationships.Behavior research methods · 2019Article
- Core body temperature speeds up temporal processing and choice behavior under deadlines.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Characterizing synchrony patterns across cognitive task stages of associative recognition memory.The European journal of neuroscience · 2018Article
- The Common Time Course of Memory Processes Revealed.Psychological science · 2018Article
- Does prediction error drive one-shot declarative learning?Journal of memory and language · 2017Article
- The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Sternberg's method.Psychological review · 2016Article
- How Fuzzy-Trace Theory Predicts True and False Memories for Words, Sentences, and Narratives.Journal of applied research in memory and cognition · 2016Article
- When High-Capacity Readers Slow Down and Low-Capacity Readers Speed Up: Working Memory and Locality Effects.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Article
- Stochastic accumulation of feature information in perception and memory.Frontiers in psychology · 2014Review
- The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated the time course of associative recognition using the response signal procedure, whereby a stimulus is presented and followed after a variable lag by a signal indicating that an immediate response is required. More specifically, we examined the effects of associative fan (the number of associations that an item has with other items in memory) on speed-accuracy tradeoff functions obtained in a previous response signal experiment involving briefly studied materials and in a new experiment involving well-learned materials. High fan lowered asymptotic accuracy or the rate of rise in accuracy across lags, or both. We developed an Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (ACT-R) model for the response signal procedure to explain these effects. The model assumes that high fan results in weak associative activation that slows memory retrieval, thereby decreasing the probability that retrieval finishes in time and producing a speed-accuracy tradeoff function. The ACT-R model provided an excellent account of the data, yielding quantitative fits that were as good as those of the best descriptive model for response signal data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.