Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22197271›Full record

ReviewHormones and behavior2012

Modulating social behavior with oxytocin: how does it work? What does it mean?

Patricia S Churchland, Piotr Winkielman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hormones and behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 181 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
181citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

181 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Opposing effects of oxytocin on overt compliance and lasting changes to memory.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Oxytocin enhances brain reward system responses in men viewing the face of their female partner.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patricia S ChurchlandPhilosophy Department, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0119, USA. pschurchland@ucsd.edu
Piotr Winkielman

Funding

Sensorimotor learning of facial expressions: A novel intervention for autismRC1MH088633 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BARTLETT, MARIAN STEWART · 2009 to 2010
$992k
NIMH NIH HHS 1RC1MH088633-01NIMH NIH HHS RC1 MH088633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among its many roles in body and brain, oxytocin influences social behavior. Understanding the precise nature of this influence is crucial, both within the broader theoretical context of neurobiology, social neuroscience and brain evolution, but also within a clinical context of disorders such as anxiety, schizophrenia, and autism. Research exploring oxytocin's role in human social behavior is difficult owing to its release in both body and brain and its interactive effects with other hormones and neuromodulators. Additional difficulties are due to the intricacies of the blood-brain barrier and oxytocin's instability, which creates measurement issues. Questions concerning how to interpret behavioral results of human experiments manipulating oxytocin are thus made all the more pressing. The current paper discusses several such questions. We highlight unresolved fundamental issues about what exactly happens when oxytocin is administered intranasally, whether such oxytocin does in fact reach appropriate receptors in brain, and whether central or peripheral influences account for the observed behavioral effects. We also highlight the deeper conceptual issue of whether the human data should be narrowly interpreted as implicating a specific role for oxytocin in complex social cognition, such a generosity, trust, or mentalizing, or more broadly interpreted as implicating a lower-level general effect on general states and dispositions, such as anxiety and social motivation. Using several influential studies, we show how seemingly specific, higher-level social-cognitive effects can emerge via a process by which oxytocin's broad influence is channeled into a specific social behavior in a context of an appropriate social and research setting. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Social Behavior.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsAnti-Anxiety AgentsAnxietyCognitionHumansOxytocinVasopressinsAnti-Anxiety AgentsOxytocinVasopressins

Identifiers

PMID22197271
PMCPMC3312973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.