ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2011
Leveraging terminologies for retrieval of radiology reports with critical imaging findings.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) for Processing Free Text in Health Care: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Semiautomated System for Nonurgent, Clinically Significant Pathology Results.Applied clinical informatics · 2018Article
- Assessing Inaccuracies in Automated Information Extraction of Breast Imaging Findings.Journal of digital imaging · 2017Article
- Neuroimaging Feature Terminology: A Controlled Terminology for the Annotation of Brain Imaging Features.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2017Article
- Evaluating Terminologies to Enable Imaging-Related Decision Rule Sharing.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016Article
- Four-year impact of an alert notification system on closed-loop communication of critical test results.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2014Article
- Journal club: Renal masses detected at abdominal CT: radiologists' adherence to guidelines regarding management recommendations and communication of critical results.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2014Article
- Information from Searching Content with an Ontology-Utilizing Toolkit (iSCOUT).Journal of digital imaging · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCommunication of critical imaging findings is an important component of medical quality and safety. A fundamental challenge includes retrieval of radiology reports that contain these findings. This study describes the expressiveness and coverage of existing medical terminologies for critical imaging findings and evaluates radiology report retrieval using each terminology.
methodsFour terminologies were evaluated: National Cancer Institute Thesaurus (NCIT), Radiology Lexicon (RadLex), Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED-CT), and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM). Concepts in each terminology were identified for 10 critical imaging findings. Three findings were subsequently selected to evaluate document retrieval.
resultsSNOMED-CT consistently demonstrated the highest number of overall terms (mean=22) for each of ten critical findings. However, retrieval rate and precision varied between terminologies for the three findings evaluated.
conclusionNo single terminology is optimal for retrieving radiology reports with critical findings. The expressiveness of a terminology does not consistently correlate with radiology report retrieval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22195212PMC3243125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.