Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22195209›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2011

Expressing observations from electronic medical record flowsheets in an i2b2 based clinical data repository to support research and quality improvement.

Lemuel R Waitman, Judith J Warren, E LaVerne Manos, Daniel W Connolly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prognostic Implications of Skin Invasion in Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lemuel R WaitmanDivision of Medical Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Judith J Warren
E LaVerne Manos
Daniel W Connolly

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While nursing documentation in electronic medical record (EMR) flowsheets may represent the largest investment of clinician time with information systems, organizations lack tools to visualize and repurpose this data for research and quality improvement. Incorporating flowsheet documentation into a clinical data repository and methods to reduce the flowsheet ontology's redundancy are described. 411 million flowsheet observations, derived from an EMR predominantly used in inpatient, outpatient oncology, and emergency room settings, were incorporated into a repository using the i2b2 framework. The local flowsheet ontology contained 720 "templates" employing 5,379 groups (2,678 distinct), 37,836 measures (13,659 distinct) containing 226,666 choices for a total size of 270,641. Aggressive pruning and clustering resulted in 150 templates, 743 groups (615 distinct), 6,950 measures (4,066 distinct) with 22,497 choices, and size of 30,371. Making nursing data accessible within i2b2 provides a new perspective for contributing clinical organizations and heightens collaboration between the academic and clinical activities.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNursing RecordsUser-Computer InterfaceDatabases as TopicDocumentationHumansInformation SystemsKansasQuality ImprovementSoftware DesignTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID22195209
PMCPMC3243191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.