Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22195200›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2011

An OWL meta-ontology for representing the Clinical Element Model.

Cui Tao, Craig G Parker, Thomas A Oniki, Jyotishman Pathak, Stanley M Huff, Christopher G Chute

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An information model for computable cancer phenotypes.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lessons learned in detailed clinical modeling at Intermountain Healthcare.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cui TaoDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
Craig G Parker
Thomas A Oniki
Jyotishman Pathak
Stanley M Huff
Christopher G Chute

Funding

UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000002 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2012 to 2015
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000002PHS HHS 90TR0002-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Clinical Element Model (CEM) is a strategy designed to represent logical models for clinical data elements to ensure unambiguous data representation, interpretation, and exchange within and across heterogeneous sources and applications. The current representations of CEMs have limitations on expressing semantics and formal definitions of the structure and the semantics. Here we introduce our initial efforts on representing the CEM in OWL, so that the enrichment with OWL semantics and further semantic processing can be achieved in CEM. The focus of this paper is the CEM meta-ontology where the basic structures, the properties and their relationships, and the constraints are defined. These OWL representation specifications have been reviewed by CEM experts to ensure they capture the intended meaning of the model faithfully.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsVocabulary, ControlledInformation Storage and RetrievalMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedProgramming LanguagesSemanticsSystems Integration

Identifiers

PMID22195200
PMCPMC3243162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.