Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22195155›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2011

OpenMRS, a global medical records system collaborative: factors influencing successful implementation.

Nareesa A Mohammed-Rajput, Dawn C Smith, Burke Mamlin, Paul Biondich, Brad N Doebbeling, Open MRS Collaborative Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Implications for informatics given expanding access to care for Veterans and other populations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nareesa A Mohammed-RajputRegenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Dawn C Smith
Burke Mamlin
Paul Biondich
Brad N Doebbeling
Open MRS Collaborative Investigators

Funding

REGENSTRIEF MEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPST15LM007117 · NLM · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI FINNELL, JOHN T · 1997 to 2011
$5.0M
NLM NIH HHS 5T 15 LM007117-14NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OpenMRS is an open-source, robust electronic health record (EHR) platform that is supported by a large global network and used in over forty countries. We explored what factors lead to successful implementation of OpenMRS in resource constrained settings. Data sources included in-person and telephone key informant interviews, focus groups and responses to an electronic survey from 10 sites in 7 countries. Qualitative data was coded through independent coding, discussion and consensus. The most common perceived benefits of implementation were for providing clinical care, reporting to funders, managing operations and research. Successful implementation factors include securing adequate infrastructure, and sociotechnical system factors, particularly adequate staffing, computers, and ability to use software. Strategic and tactical planning were successful strategies, including understanding and addressing the infrastructure and human costs involved, training or hiring personnel technically capable of modifying the software and integrating it into the daily work flow to meet clinicians' needs.

Indexed as

SoftwareAttitude to ComputersData CollectionElectronic Health RecordsHumansMedical Records Systems, Computerized

Identifiers

PMID22195155
PMCPMC3243141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.