ReviewAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2011
GEM at 10: a decade's experience with the Guideline Elements Model.
Review in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Guidelines for Point-of-Care Decision Support in Obstetrics.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- Translating an evidence-based clinical pathway into shareable CDS: developing a systematic process using publicly available tools.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- A Computer-Interpretable Guideline for COVID-19: Rapid Development and Dissemination.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Does not compute: challenges and solutions in managing computable biomedical knowledge.BMJ health & care informatics · 2020Article
- Physician Prescribing of Opioids to Patients at Increased Risk of Overdose From Benzodiazepine Use in the United States.JAMA psychiatry · 2018Article
- Next generation terminology infrastructure to support interprofessional care planning.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Article
- Clinical Decision Support: a 25 Year Retrospective and a 25 Year Vision.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2016Review
- Improving access to clinical practice guidelines with an interactive graphical interface using an iconic language.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2014Article
- A study of diverse clinical decision support rule authoring environments and requirements for integration.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Guideline Elements Model (GEM) was developed in 2000 to organize the information contained in clinical practice guidelines using XML and to represent guideline content in a form that can be understood by human readers and processed by computers. In this work, we systematically reviewed the literature to better understand how GEM was being used, potential barriers to its use, and suggestions for improvement. Fifty external and twelve internally produced publications were identified and analyzed. GEM was used most commonly for modeling and ontology creation. Other investigators applied GEM for knowledge extraction and data mining, for clinical decision support for guideline generation. The GEM Cutter software-used to markup guidelines for translation into XML- has been downloaded 563 times since 2000. Although many investigators found GEM to be valuable, others critiqued its failure to clarify guideline semantics, difficulties in markup, and the fact that GEM files are not usually executable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22195106PMC3243287What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.