ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2011
Testing Three Problem List Terminologies in a simulated data entry environment.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) for Processing Free Text in Health Care: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Generalized Extraction and Classification of Span-Level Clinical Phrases.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
- Analyzing structural changes in SNOMED CT's Bacterial infectious diseases using a visual semantic delta.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Article
- Is the problem list in the eye of the beholder? An exploration of consistency across physicians.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Lightweight application for generating clinical research information systems: MAGIC.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2015Article
- An exploration of the properties of the CORE problem list subset and how it facilitates the implementation of SNOMED CT.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- Identifying inconsistencies in SNOMED CT problem lists using structural indicators.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three Problem List Terminologies (PLT) were tested using a web-based application simulating a clinical data entry environment to evaluate coverage and coding efficiency. The three PLTs were: the CORE Problem List Subset of SNOMED CT, a clinical subset extracted from the full SNOMED CT and the PLT currently used at the Mayo Clinic. Candidate problem statements were randomly extracted from free text problem list entries contained in two electronic medical record systems. Physician reviewers searched for concepts in one of the three PLTs that most closely matched a problem statement. Altogether 45 reviewers reviewed 15 problems each. The coverage of the much smaller CORE Subset was comparable to Clinical SNOMED for combined exact or partial matches. The CORE Subset required the shortest time to find a concept. This may be related to the smaller size of the pick lists for the CORE Subset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22195098PMC3243193What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.