ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2011
Development of a workflow integration survey (WIS) for implementing computerized clinical decision support.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An AI-Based Chatbot to Support Health-Related Social Needs among Pediatric Primary Care Population: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Workflow integration analysis of a human factors-based clinical decision support in the emergency department.Applied ergonomics · 2021Article
- Acute care nurses' perceptions of electronic health record use: A mixed method study.Nursing open · 2018Article
- Field Investigation of Ambulatory Clinic Exam Room Design with respect to Computing Devices: A Pilot Study.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting · 2018Article
- Ambulatory Clinic Exam Room Design with respect to Computing Devices: A Laboratory Simulation Study.IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors · 2018Article
- Redesign of a computerized clinical reminder for colorectal cancer screening: a human-computer interaction evaluation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2011Article
- Factors Influencing Electronic Health Record Workflow Integration Among Nurses in Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
- Development of the RightWheel manual wheelchair wheel rolling resistance clinical decision support system through iterative clinician interviews.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interventions that focus on improving computerized clinical decision support (CDS) demonstrate that successful workflow integration can increase the adoption and use of CDS. However, metrics for assessing workflow integration in clinical settings are not well established. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a survey to assess the extent to which CDS is integrated into workflow. Qualitative data on CDS design, usability, and integration from four sites was collected by direct observation, interviews, and focus groups. Thematic analysis based on the sociotechnical systems theory revealed consistent themes across sites. Themes related to workflow integration included navigation, functionality, usability, and workload. Based on these themes, a brief 12-item scale to assess workflow integration was developed, refined, and validated with providers in a simulation study. To our knowledge, this is one of the first tools developed to specifically measure workflow integration of CDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22195096PMC3243260What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.