Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22195094›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2011

All health care is not local: an evaluation of the distribution of Emergency Department care delivered in Indiana.

John T Finnell, J Marc Overhage, Shaun Grannis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A framework for a consistent and reproducible evaluation of manual review for patient matching algorithms.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical data sharing improves quality measurement and patient safety.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluating the effect of data standardization and validation on patient matching accuracy.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John T FinnellThe Regenstrief Institute and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J Marc Overhage
Shaun Grannis

Funding

PHITPO CDC HHS 1P01HK000077-01PHITPO CDC HHS P01 HK000077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Emergency Department (ED) delivers a major portion of health care - often with incomplete knowledge about the patient. As such, EDs are particularly likely to benefit from a health information exchange (HIE). The Indiana Public Health Emergency Surveillance System (PHESS) sends real-time registration information for emergency department encounters. Over the three-year study period, we found 2.8 million patients generated 7.4 million ED visits. The average number of visits was 2.6 visits/patient (range 1-385). We found more than 40% of ED visits during the study period were for patients having data at multiple institutions. When examining the network density, we found nearly all EDs share patients with more than 80 other EDs. Our results help clarify future health care policy decisions regarding optimal NHIN architecture and discount the notion that 'all healthcare is local'.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareEmergency Service, HospitalHumansIndianaPopulation Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID22195094
PMCPMC3243262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.