Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22195088›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2011

Leveraging standards to support patient-centric interdisciplinary plans of care.

Patricia C Dykes, Rebecca R DaDamio, Denise Goldsmith, Hyeon-eui Kim, Kumiko Ohashi, Virginia K Saba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nursing domain of CI governance: recommendations for health IT adoption and optimization.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A framework for harmonizing terminologies to support representation of nursing practice in electronic records.NI 2012 : 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th : 2012 : Montreal, Quebec) · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patricia C DykesCenter for Nursing Excellence, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Rebecca R DaDamio
Denise Goldsmith
Hyeon-eui Kim
Kumiko Ohashi
Virginia K Saba

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As health care systems and providers move towards meaningful use of electronic health records, the once distant vision of collaborative patient-centric, interdisciplinary plans of care, generated and updated across organizations and levels of care, may soon become a reality. Effective care planning is included in the proposed Stages 2-3 Meaningful Use quality measures. To facilitate interoperability, standardization of plan of care messaging, content, information and terminology models are needed. This degree of standardization requires local and national coordination. The purpose of this paper is to review some existing standards that may be leveraged to support development of interdisciplinary patient-centric plans of care. Standards are then applied to a use case to demonstrate one method for achieving patient-centric and interoperable interdisciplinary plan of care documentation. Our pilot work suggests that existing standards provide a foundation for adoption and implementation of patient-centric plans of care that are consistent with federal requirements.

Indexed as

Meaningful UsePatient-Centered CareElectronic Health RecordsHealth Level SevenHumansPatient Care PlanningPilot ProjectsSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineTerminology as TopicUnited Stateselectronic health recordmeaningful useplan of careterminology standards

Identifiers

PMID22195088
PMCPMC3243254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.