ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2011
SNOMED CT revisions and coded data repositories: when to upgrade?
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
SNOMED CT is gaining momentum in its acceptance and operational application as a reference terminology in electronic health systems. Because it is revised every six months, organizations using SNOMED CT might feel a need to ensure that their systems are synchronized with these revisions. It has been shown that for certain sorts of applications migration to a new version is a labor-intensive process. Here two indicators - the evolution of the global information content of an ontology over consecutive versions, and the perseverance of suspicious events - are proposed to assess whether it is worthwhile upgrading when a new version is released. The indicators can be computed automatically when a new version is released and are statistically unrelated. Trend breaks in their evolution are suggestive for the possible benefit of an upgrade and their predictive power correlates well with the retrospective realism-based quality metric which forms the basis of Evolutionary Terminology Auditing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22195071PMC3243179What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.