ArticlePloS one2011
Partner-aware prediction of interacting residues in protein-protein complexes from sequence data.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coevolutionary signals in multiple sequence alignments improve virulence factor prediction with an MSA Transformer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in protein-protein interaction prediction: a deep learning perspective.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Challenges of Protein-Protein Docking of the Membrane Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Integrated structure-based protein interface prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Hierarchical representation for PPI sites prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Residue-Residue Interaction Prediction via Stacked Meta-Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Mechanistic differences in the effects of sucrose and sucralose on the phase stability of lysozyme solutions.Journal of molecular liquids · 2021Article
- Simplified geometric representations of protein structures identify complementary interaction interfaces.Proteins · 2021Article
- ISLAND: in-silico proteins binding affinity prediction using sequence information.BioData mining · 2020Article
- Prediction of Protein-Protein Interaction Sites Using Convolutional Neural Network and Improved Data Sets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Attention mechanism enhanced LSTM with residual architecture and its application for protein-protein interaction residue pairs prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- SCRIBER: accurate and partner type-specific prediction of protein-binding residues from proteins sequences.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Partner-specific prediction of RNA-binding residues in proteins: A critical assessment.Proteins · 2019Article
- BIPSPI: a method for the prediction of partner-specific protein-protein interfaces.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- Learning protein binding affinity using privileged information.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Pattern to Knowledge: Deep Knowledge-Directed Machine Learning for Residue-Residue Interaction Prediction.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Evolution of In Silico Strategies for Protein-Protein Interaction Drug Discovery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Exploring the potential of 3D Zernike descriptors and SVM for protein-protein interface prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational prediction of residues that participate in protein-protein interactions is a difficult task, and state of the art methods have shown only limited success in this arena. One possible problem with these methods is that they try to predict interacting residues without incorporating information about the partner protein, although it is unclear how much partner information could enhance prediction performance. To address this issue, the two following comparisons are of crucial significance: (a) comparison between the predictability of inter-protein residue pairs, i.e., predicting exactly which residue pairs interact with each other given two protein sequences; this can be achieved by either combining conventional single-protein predictions or making predictions using a new model trained directly on the residue pairs, and the performance of these two approaches may be compared: (b) comparison between the predictability of the interacting residues in a single protein (irrespective of the partner residue or protein) from conventional methods and predictions converted from the pair-wise trained model. Using these two streams of training and validation procedures and employing similar two-stage neural networks, we showed that the models trained on pair-wise contacts outperformed the partner-unaware models in predicting both interacting pairs and interacting single-protein residues. Prediction performance decreased with the size of the conformational change upon complex formation; this trend is similar to docking, even though no structural information was used in our prediction. An example application that predicts two partner-specific interfaces of a protein was shown to be effective, highlighting the potential of the proposed approach. Finally, a preliminary attempt was made to score docking decoy poses using prediction of interacting residue pairs; this analysis produced an encouraging result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.