Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22194930›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Checkpoint signaling, base excision repair, and PARP promote survival of colon cancer cells treated with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine but not 5-fluorouracil.

Liyi Geng, Amelia M Huehls, Jill M Wagner, Catherine J Huntoon, Larry M Karnitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: recent advances and future development.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2014
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liyi GengDivision of Oncology Research, Mayo Clinic, College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Amelia M Huehls
Jill M Wagner
Catherine J Huntoon
Larry M Karnitz

Funding

Use of microfluidic tumor cultures to enable clinical trials of therapies for ovarian cancerP50CA136393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Zhenkun Lou · 2009 to 2026
$37.0M
Predoctoral Training Program in Molecular PharmacologyT32GM072474 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KARNITZ, LARRY M · 2005 to 2020
$2.4M
ANALYSIS OF A DNA DAMAGE INDUCIBLE CHECKPOINT COMPLEXR01CA084321 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KARNITZ, LARRY M · 2000 to 2008
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136393NCI NIH HHS P50-CA136393NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084321NCI NIH HHS R01-CA084321NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM072474PHS HHS GT32-M072474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fluoropyrimidines 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and FdUrd (5-fluorodeoxyuridine; floxuridine) are the backbone of chemotherapy regimens for colon cancer and other tumors. Despite their widespread use, it remains unclear how these agents kill tumor cells. Here, we have analyzed the checkpoint and DNA repair pathways that affect colon tumor responses to 5-FU and FdUrd. These studies demonstrate that both FdUrd and 5-FU activate the ATR and ATM checkpoint signaling pathways, indicating that they cause genotoxic damage. Notably, however, depletion of ATM or ATR does not sensitize colon cancer cells to 5-FU, whereas these checkpoint pathways promote the survival of cells treated with FdUrd, suggesting that FdUrd exerts cytotoxicity by disrupting DNA replication and/or inducing DNA damage, whereas 5-FU does not. We also found that disabling the base excision (BER) repair pathway by depleting XRCC1 or APE1 sensitized colon cancer cells to FdUrd but not 5-FU. Consistent with a role for the BER pathway, we show that small molecule poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 (PARP) inhibitors, AZD2281 and ABT-888, remarkably sensitized both mismatch repair (MMR)-proficient and -deficient colon cancer cell lines to FdUrd but not to 5-FU. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the roles of genotoxin-induced checkpoint signaling and DNA repair differ significantly for these agents and also suggest a novel approach to colon cancer therapy in which FdUrd is combined with a small molecule PARP inhibitor.

Indexed as

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalColonic NeoplasmsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Mismatch RepairDNA RepairDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorEnzyme InhibitorsFloxuridineFluorouracilHumansPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanATR protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsEnzyme InhibitorsFloxuridineFluorouracilPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSmall Molecule LibrariesTumor Suppressor ProteinsX-ray Repair Cross Complementing Protein 1XRCC1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22194930
PMCPMC3240632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.