ArticlePloS one2011
Quantitative genetics of body size and timing of maturation in two nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sexual selection on male but not female function in monoecious and dioecious populations of broadleaf arrowhead (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Relaxed risk of predation drives parallel evolution of stickleback behavior.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022Article
- The evolution of sex determination associated with a chromosomal inversion.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Age at maturation has sex- and temperature-specific effects on telomere length in a fish.Oecologia · 2017Article
- Article
- Quantitative trait locus analysis of body shape divergence in nine-spined sticklebacks based on high-density SNP-panel.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Genetic basis for body size variation between an anadromous and two derived lacustrine populations of threespine sticklebackCurrent zoology · 2016Article
- Population divergence in compensatory growth responses and their costs in sticklebacks.Ecology and evolution · 2015Article
- Geographic variation in age structure and longevity in the nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius).PloS one · 2014Article
- Genomic divergence between nine- and three-spined sticklebacks.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Progressive recombination suppression and differentiation in recently evolved neo-sex chromosomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2013Article
- Repeated lake-stream divergence in stickleback life history within a Central European lake basin.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to its influence on body size, timing of maturation is an important life-history trait in ectotherms with indeterminate growth. Comparison of patterns of growth and maturation within and between two populations (giant vs. normal sized) of nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius) in a breeding experiment revealed that the difference in mean adult body size between the populations is caused by differences in timing of maturation, and not by differential growth rates. The fish in small-sized population matured earlier than those from large-sized population, and maturation was accompanied by a reduction in growth rate in the small-sized population. Males matured earlier and at smaller size than females, and the fish that were immature at the end of the experiment were larger than those that had already matured. Throughout the experimental period, body size in both populations was heritable (h(2) = 0.10-0.64), as was the timing of maturation in the small-sized population (h(2) = 0.13-0.16). There was a significant positive genetic correlation between body size and timing of maturation at 140 DAH, but not earlier (at 80 or 110 DAH). Comparison of observed body size divergence between the populations revealed that Q(ST) exceeded F(ST) at older ages, indicating adaptive basis for the observed divergence. Hence, the results suggest that the body size differences within and between populations reflect heritable genetic differences in the timing of maturation, and that the observed body size divergence is adaptive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.