Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22194821›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Genotypes and toxin gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from China.

Yanping Xie, Yiping He, Andrew Gehring, Yu Hu, Qiongqiong Li, Shu-I Tu, Xianming Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prevention and Treatment ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Occurrence of Methicillin-ResistantVeterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Clonal Diversity and Epidemiological Characteristics of ST239-MRSA Strains.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  14. Characterisation ofEpidemiology and infection · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Molecular and Phenotypic Characteristics ofBioMed research international · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yanping XieSchool of Agriculture and Biology, Bor Luh Food Safety Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yiping He
Andrew Gehring
Yu Hu
Qiongqiong Li
Shu-I Tu
Xianming Shi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 108 S. aureus isolates from 16 major hospitals located in 14 different provinces in China were characterized for the profiles of 18 staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) genes, 3 exfoliatin genes (eta, etb and etd), and the toxic shock syndrome toxin gene (tsst) by PCR. The genomic diversity of each isolate was also evaluated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and accessory gene regulator (agr) typing. Of these strains, 90.7% (98/108) harbored toxin genes, in which tsst was the most prevalent toxin gene (48.1%), followed by sea (44.4%), sek (42.6%) and seq (40.7%). The see and etb genes were not found in any of the isolates tested. Because of high-frequency transfer of toxin gene-containing mobile genetic elements between S. aureus strains, a total of 47 different toxin gene combinations were detected, including a complete egc cluster in 19 isolates, co-occurrence of sea, sek and seq in 38 strains, and sec and sel together in 11 strains. Genetic typing by PFGE grouped all the strains into 25 clusters based on 80% similarity. MLST revealed 25 sequence types (ST) which were assigned into 16 clonal complexes (CCs) including 2 new singletons. Among these, 11 new and 6 known STs were first reported in the S. aureus strains from China. Overall, the genotyping results showed high genetic diversity of the strains regardless of their geographical distributions, and no strong correlation between genetic background and toxin genotypes of the strains. For genotyping S. aureus, PFGE appears to be more discriminatory than MLST. However, toxin gene typing combined with PFGE or MLST could increase the discriminatory power of genotyping S. aureus strains.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacterial ToxinsChinaCluster AnalysisElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenes, BacterialGenetic VariationGenotypeGeographyHumansMolecular Sequence DataMultilocus Sequence TypingPhylogenyStaphylococcus aureusBacterial Toxins

Identifiers

PMID22194821
PMCPMC3240617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.