Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22194529›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2012

Coffee, tea, and sugar-sweetened carbonated soft drink intake and pancreatic cancer risk: a pooled analysis of 14 cohort studies.

Jeanine M Genkinger, Ruifeng Li, Donna Spiegelman, Kristin E Anderson, Demetrius Albanes, Leif Bergkvist, Leslie Bernstein, Amanda Black, Piet A van den Brandt, Dallas R English and 19 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Global trends in pancreas cancer among Asia-Pacific population.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sugary drinks and cancer risk.Translational cancer research · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 2 institutions in 5 countries.

Jeanine M GenkingerMailman School of Public Health, 722 w 168th St, Rm 803, New York, NY 10032, USA. jg3081@columbia.edu
Ruifeng Li
Donna Spiegelman
Kristin E Anderson
Demetrius Albanes
Leif Bergkvist
Leslie Bernstein
Amanda Black
Piet A van den Brandt
Dallas R English
Jo L Freudenheim
Charles S Fuchs
Graham G Giles
Edward Giovannucci
R Alexandra Goldbohm
Pamela L Horn-Ross
Eric J Jacobs
Anita Koushik
Satu Männistö
James R Marshall
Anthony B Miller
Alpa V Patel
Kim Robien
Thomas E Rohan
Catherine Schairer
Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon
Alicja Wolk
Regina G Ziegler
Stephanie A Smith-Warner
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USBuffalo State University · US

Funding

Validity of Diet and Activity Measures in WomenP01CA055075 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI WILLETT, WALTER C. · 1991 to 2009
$41.8M
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CANCER IN A COHORT OF OLDER WOMENR01CA039742 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LAZOVICH, DEANN · 1985 to 2014
$8.0M
Nutritional Epidemiology of Cancer Education and Career Development ProgramR25CA098566 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI STAMPFER, MEIR · 2003 to 2013
$4.5M
Prospective Cohort Collaborative in Pancreatic Cancer Epidemiology & PathogenesisR01CA124908 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI FUCHS, CHARLES S · 2007 to 2012
$4.3M
New Methods for the design and evaluation of large HIV prevention interventionsR01AI112339 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SPIEGELMAN, DONNA L · 2014 to 2017
$2.7M
Dietary Factors and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in a Pooled AnalysisU01CA139578 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI GENKINGER, JEANINE M. · 2009 to 2010
$177k
NCI NIH HHS CA098566NCI NIH HHS CA139578NCI NIH HHS CA55075NCI NIH HHS P01 CA055075NCI NIH HHS R01 CA039742NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124908NCI NIH HHS R25 CA098566NCI NIH HHS U01 CA139578NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI112339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoffee has been hypothesized to have pro- and anticarcinogenic properties, whereas tea may contain anticarcinogenic compounds. Studies assessing coffee intake and pancreatic cancer risk have yielded mixed results, whereas findings for tea intake have mostly been null. Sugar-sweetened carbonated soft drink (SSB) intake has been associated with higher circulating levels of insulin, which may promote carcinogenesis. Few prospective studies have examined SSB intake and pancreatic cancer risk; results have been heterogeneous.

methodsIn this pooled analysis from 14 prospective cohort studies, 2,185 incident pancreatic cancer cases were identified among 853,894 individuals during follow-up. Multivariate (MV) study-specific relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models and then pooled using a random-effects model.

resultsNo statistically significant associations were observed between pancreatic cancer risk and intake of coffee (MVRR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.81-1.48 comparing ≥900 to <0 g/d; 237g ≈ 8oz), tea (MVRR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78-1.16 comparing ≥400 to 0 g/d; 237g ≈ 8oz), or SSB (MVRR = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.98-1.46 comparing ≥250 to 0 g/d; 355g ≈ 12oz; P value, test for between-studies heterogeneity > 0.05). These associations were consistent across levels of sex, smoking status, and body mass index. When modeled as a continuous variable, a positive association was evident for SSB (MVRR = 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12). CONCLUSION AND IMPACT: Overall, no associations were observed for intakes of coffee or tea during adulthood and pancreatic cancer risk. Although we were only able to examine modest intake of SSB, there was a suggestive, modest positive association for risk of pancreatic cancer for intakes of SSB.

Indexed as

CoffeeTeaAdultCarbohydratesCarbonated BeveragesCohort StudiesHumansMalePancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung AdultCarbohydratesCoffeeTea

Identifiers

PMID22194529
PMCPMC3275675
OpenAlexW2100889109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.