ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2012
Prolonged α-amanitin treatment of cells for studying mutated polymerases causes degradation of DSIF160 and other proteins.
Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- RNA polymerase II speed: a key player in controlling and adapting transcriptome composition.The EMBO journal · 2021Review
- The RNA polymerase II CTD "orphan" residues: Emerging insights into the functions of Tyr-1, Thr-4, and Ser-7.Transcription · 2018Review
- Integrator: surprisingly diverse functions in gene expression.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2015Review
- Function and control of RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain phosphorylation in vertebrate transcription and RNA processing.Molecular and cellular biology · 2014Article
- CTD serine-2 plays a critical role in splicing and termination factor recruitment to RNA polymerase II in vivo.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- The RNA polymerase II CTD coordinates transcription and RNA processing.Genes & development · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A useful method for studying the function of the mammalian RNA polymerase II takes advantage of the extreme sensitivity of its largest subunit, Rpb1, to α-amanitin. Mutations of interest are introduced into an α-amanitin-resistant version of Rpb1, which is then expressed ectopically in cells. The phenotypes of these cells are then examined after inhibiting the endogenous wild-type polymerase with α-amanitin. Here, we show that cells that are enabled to grow in α-amanitin by expression of an α-amanitin-resistant Rpb1 exhibit changes in cell physiology that can lead to misleading experimental outcomes. The changes we have characterized include the accelerated degradation of some proteins, such as DSIF160, and the reduced rate of synthesis of others. In one series of experiments, we examined an α-amanitin-resistant construct, with a mutant C-terminal domain (CTD), that was unable to direct poly(A)-dependent transcription termination in cells growing in α-amanitin. The potential interpretation that the termination defect in this construct is due to the mutation in the CTD was rejected when the construct was found to be termination-competent in cells grown in the absence of α-amanitin. Instead, it appears that certain termination factors become limiting when the cells are grown in α-amanitin, presumably due to the α-amanitin-induced degradation we have characterized and/or to the inadequate transcription of certain genes by the α-amanitin-resistant Rpb1-containing polymerase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.