ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2012
Information content and reward processing in the human striatum during performance of a declarative memory task.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Distinct Reward Properties are Encoded via Corticostriatal Interactions.Scientific reports · 2016Trial
- Brain Activation of Negative Feedback in Rule Acquisition Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.PloS one · 2015Trial
- The Cerebellum and Striatum in Reward Processing: Caring About Being Right vs. Caring About Reward.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Absence of hippocampal pathology persists in the Q175DN mouse model of Huntington's disease despite elevated HTT aggregation.Journal of Huntington's disease · 2025Article
- Investigating resting-state functional connectivity changes within procedural memory network across neuropsychiatric disorders using fMRI.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Independent and interacting value systems for reward and information in the human brain.eLife · 2022Article
- Basal ganglia activation localized in MEG using a reward task.Neuroimage. Reports · 2021Article
- Functional connectivity between frontal/parietal regions and MTL-basal ganglia during feedback learning and declarative memory retrieval.Journal of biosciences · 2021Article
- Striatal reactivity to reward under threat-of-shock and working memory load in adults at increased familial risk for major depression: A preliminary study.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2020Article
- Corticostriatal Circuits Encode the Subjective Value of Perceived Control.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2019Article
- Expectation effects on brain dopamine responses to methylphenidate in cocaine use disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2019Article
- Effects of Expressive Writing on Neural Processing During Learning.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Valuation of knowledge and ignorance in mesolimbic reward circuitry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Manipulating memory efficacy affects the behavioral and neural profiles of deterministic learning and decision-making.Neuropsychologia · 2018Article
- Knowledge acquisition is governed by striatal prediction errors.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Electrophysiological Response to the Informative Value of Feedback Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- The benefits of negative yet informative feedback.PloS one · 2018Article
- Signed reward prediction errors drive declarative learning.PloS one · 2018Article
- The integration of social influence and reward: Computational approaches and neural evidence.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Negative feedback can signal poor performance, but it also provides information that can help learners reach the goal of task mastery. The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the amount of information provided by negative feedback during a paired-associate learning task influences feedback-related processing in the caudate nucleus. To do this, we manipulated the number of response options: With two options, positive and negative feedback provide equal amounts of information, whereas with four options, positive feedback provides more information than does negative feedback. We found that positive and negative feedback activated the caudate similarly when there were two response options. With four options, the caudate's response to negative feedback was reduced. A secondary goal was to investigate the link between brain-based measures of feedback-related processing and behavioral indices of learning. Analysis of the posttest measures showed that trials with positive feedback were associated with higher posttest confidence ratings. Additionally, when positive feedback was delivered, caudate activity was greater for trials with high than with low posttest confidence. This experiment demonstrated the context sensitivity of feedback processing and provided evidence that feedback processing in the striatum can contribute to the strengthening of the representations available within declarative memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.