Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22193955›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell science2011

A feedback loop between Wolbachia and the Drosophila gurken mRNP complex influences Wolbachia titer.

Laura R Serbus, Amy Ferreccio, Mariya Zhukova, Chanel L McMorris, Elena Kiseleva, William Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The cellular lives of Wolbachia.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Restriction ofmBio · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Trends in Symbiont-Induced Host Cellular Differentiation.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reliance ofGenetics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura R SerbusMCD Biology, University of California, 1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. lrserbus@ucsc.edu
Amy Ferreccio
Mariya Zhukova
Chanel L McMorris
Elena Kiseleva
William Sullivan
University of California, Santa Cruz · USInstitute of Cytology and Genetics · RU

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ IMSD PROGRAMR25GM058903 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI JURICA, MELISSA S · 1999 to 2019
$12.2M
The molecular basis of bacteria-host interaction Drosophila melanogasterF32GM080192 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI SERBUS, LAURA R · 2007 to 2008
$96k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM080192NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM058903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although much is known about interactions between bacterial endosymbionts and their hosts, little is known concerning the host factors that influence endosymbiont titer. Wolbachia endosymbionts are globally dispersed throughout most insect species and are the causative agent in filarial nematode-mediated disease. Our investigation indicates that gurken (grk), a host gene encoding a crucial axis determinant, has a cumulative, dosage-sensitive impact on Wolbachia growth and proliferation during Drosophila oogenesis. This effect appears to be mediated by grk mRNA and its protein-binding partners Squid and Hrp48/Hrb27C, implicating the grk mRNA-protein (mRNP) complex as a rate-limiting host factor controlling Wolbachia titer. Furthermore, highly infected flies exhibit defects that match those occurring with disruption of grk mRNPs, such as nurse cell chromatin disruptions and malformation of chorionic appendages. These findings suggest a feedback loop in which Wolbachia interaction with the grk mRNP affects both Wolbachia titer and grk mRNP function.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFeedback, PhysiologicalMicrotubulesOocytesOogenesisRibonucleoproteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsSymbiosisTransforming Growth Factor alphaWolbachiaDrosophila Proteinsgrk protein, Drosophilamessenger ribonucleoproteinRibonucleoproteinsRNA-Binding Proteinssqd protein, DrosophilaTransforming Growth Factor alpha

Identifiers

PMID22193955
PMCPMC3258112
OpenAlexW2111965928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.