Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22193939›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2012

Risk factors of Neospora caninum infection in dogs and cats in dairy farms in Western Thailand.

Pipat Arunvipas, Tawin Inpankaew, Sathaporn Jittapalapong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Seroprevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Occurrence ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Serological Survey on the Occurrence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  7. Prevalence of Neospora spp. in donkeys in China.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pipat ArunvipasDepartment of Large Animal and Wildlife Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom Kamphaengsaen Campus, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. fvetpia@ku.ac.th
Tawin Inpankaew
Sathaporn Jittapalapong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the risk factors of Neospora caninum infection in dogs and cats found in dairy herds in western Thailand. A case-control study was conducted in dairy herds in three western provinces including Nakhon Pathom, Ratchaburi and Kanchanaburi. Blood samples of pets from 14 positive dairy herds and 26 herds from negative neighbouring farms which were randomly selected, in total blood samples from dogs and cats from 40 herds were collected and examined for antibodies against N. caninum infections using competitive ELISA and indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT). No seropositive cats were found. Of the 38 positive dogs, four (10.5%) were seropositive to N. caninum, which was higher than the proportion of seropositive in the negative herd population (one of 76, 1.3%). The higher proportion of seropositive farm dogs as compared with neighbouring dogs tended to be significant (P = 0.055).

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanCase-Control StudiesCat DiseasesCatsCattleCattle DiseasesCoccidiosisDairyingDog DiseasesDogsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectLogistic ModelsMaleAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.