Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22193771›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2012

Aprepitant for prevention of nausea and vomiting secondary to high-dose cyclophosphamide administered to patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization: a phase II trial.

Muneer H Abidi, Nishant Tageja, Lois Ayash, Judith Abrams, Voravit Ratanatharathorn, Zaid Al-Kadhimi, Lawrence Lum, Simon Cronin, Marie Ventimiglia, Joseph Uberti

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muneer H AbidiWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. abidim@karmanos.org
Nishant Tageja
Lois Ayash
Judith Abrams
Voravit Ratanatharathorn
Zaid Al-Kadhimi
Lawrence Lum
Simon Cronin
Marie Ventimiglia
Joseph Uberti
The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Enhancing neoadjuvant chemotherpay responses with targeted T cellsR01CA140314 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BEPLER, GEROLD · 2010 to 2015
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140314PHS HHS R01 092344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a phase II trial evaluating efficacy and safety of aprepitant (AP) in combination with 5-HT3 antagonist and adjusted dose dexamethasone in patients receiving high-dose cyclophosphamide (CY) and filgrastim for stem cell mobilization. We used Simon's optimal two-stage design constrained to fewer than 40 patients with 10% type I error and 85% statistical power. The first stage of the study required accrual of 18 response-evaluable patients. The primary endpoint was the control of vomiting without the use of any rescue anti-emetics at 24 h after the administration of high dose CY (4 g/m(2)). If emesis was controlled in ≥9 patients, an additional cohort of 17 patients would be enrolled. The null hypothesis would be rejected if there were ≥20 responses among 35 patients. Forty patients were enrolled, five of whom were not evaluable for response. Eighteen evaluable patients were enrolled in the first stage. Acute emesis was controlled in 10 patients; therefore, enrollment proceeded to stage 2. An additional 17 patients were enrolled; 20/35 response-evaluable patients (57%) did not develop acute vomiting or require rescue anti-emetics, thus achieving the goal of the study. A total of 22/35 response-evaluable patients (63%) met the secondary endpoint of delayed emesis control (days 2-5). Thirty-three out of 35 patients underwent successful stem cell mobilization. No ≥ grade 3 AP-related adverse events were noted. The AP regimen can effectively control acute and delayed emesis in the majority patients receiving high-dose CY.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsAprepitantCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneFemaleFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorpholinesNauseaRecombinant ProteinsAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsAprepitantCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorMorpholinesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22193771
PMCPMC3594089
OpenAlexW2072014473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.