Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22193408›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2011

BRCA1 and BRCA2: different roles in a common pathway of genome protection.

Rohini Roy, Jarin Chun, Simon N Powell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 835 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
835citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

835 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. JAK2Leukemia · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Genomic Alterations in Quadruple-Negative Breast Cancer Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

775 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rohini RoyMolecular Biology Program and Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Jarin Chun
Simon N Powell

Funding

Connections and redundancy in the BRCA1-BRCA2 pathway of homologous recombinationR01CA169306 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI POWELL, SIMON N. · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Roles of BRCA1, BRCA2 in Homologous RecombinationR01CA107640 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, SIMON N. · 2004 to 2008
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107640NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proteins encoded by the two major breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, work in a common pathway of genome protection. However, the two proteins work at different stages in the DNA damage response (DDR) and in DNA repair. BRCA1 is a pleiotropic DDR protein that functions in both checkpoint activation and DNA repair, whereas BRCA2 is a mediator of the core mechanism of homologous recombination. The links between the two proteins are not well understood, but they must exist to explain the marked similarity of human cancer susceptibility that arises with germline mutations in these genes. As discussed here, the proteins work in concert to protect the genome from double-strand DNA damage during DNA replication.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAnimalsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsDNA RepairFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinFemaleGenomic InstabilityHomologous RecombinationHumansLoss of HeterozygosityMiceNuclear ProteinsOvarian NeoplasmsProtein Structure, TertiaryBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinNuclear ProteinsPALB2 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22193408
PMCPMC4972490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.