Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22193112›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2012

Measuring coalition functioning: refining constructs through factor analysis.

Louis D Brown, Mark E Feinberg, Mark T Greenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Building Local Infrastructure for Community Adoption of Science-Based Prevention: The Role of Coalition Functioning.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2015
    Trial
  4. Improvements in Capacity Among Community Coalitions Receiving Technical Assistance Through the Coalition Check-Up.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of Resource Sharing Networks on Community Anti-Drug Coalitions' Outcomes: A Social Network Analysis.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effects of Sectoral Diversity on Community Coalition Processes and Outcomes.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Community Prevention Coalition Context and Capacity Assessment: Comparing the United States and Mexico.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Louis D BrownUniversity of Texas, El Paso, TX 79902, USA.
Mark E Feinberg
Mark T Greenberg

Funding

Using Coalitions to Support Evidence-Based Programs and Prevent Drug AbuseR03DA027942 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BROWN, LOUIS DAVIS · 2010 to 2011
$65k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA027942NIDA NIH HHS R03DA027942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internal and external coalition functioning is an important predictor of coalition success that has been linked to perceived coalition effectiveness, coalition goal achievement, coalition ability to support evidence-based programs, and coalition sustainability. Understanding which aspects of coalition functioning best predict coalition success requires the development of valid measures of empirically unique coalition functioning constructs. The goal of the present study is to examine and refine the psychometric properties of coalition functioning constructs in the following six domains: leadership, interpersonal relationships, task focus, participation benefits/costs, sustainability planning, and community support. The authors used factor analysis to identify problematic items in our original measure and then piloted new items and scales to create a more robust, psychometrically sound, multidimensional measure of coalition functioning. Scales displayed good construct validity through correlations with other measures. Discussion considers the strengths and weaknesses of the refined instrument.

Indexed as

Community NetworksFactor Analysis, StatisticalHealth Care CoalitionsHealth Status DisparitiesHumansInterpersonal RelationsLeadershipPsychometricsSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID22193112
PMCPMC3563297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.