Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22191792›Full record

ReviewDrugs2012

Plasmid-mediated resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: changing landscape and implications for therapy.

Constance Schultsz, Suzanne Geerlings

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in gastrointestinal surgery: useful in infection prevention? A systematic review.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Tandem Repeat ofInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  16. Molecular Characterization ofInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Constance SchultszDepartment of Global Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. schultsz@gmail.com
Suzanne Geerlings
University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is increasing worldwide, and pathogenic microorganisms that are resistant to all available antimicrobial agents are increasingly reported. Emerging plasmid-encoded extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases are increasingly reported worldwide. Carbapenemase production encoded by genes located on mobile genetic elements is typically accompanied by genes encoding resistance to other drug classes, often but not necessarily located on the same mobile element. Multiple plasmid-mediated mechanisms of resistance against the fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides have been described, and the combination of plasmid-mediated resistance with chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms of multiple drug classes now results in strains that are resistant to all of the main classes of commonly used antimicrobial drugs. Clinical studies of antimicrobial therapy and outcome of patients infected with ESBL- or carbapenemase-producing strains of Enterobacteriaceae compared with patients infected with susceptible strains are limited in their design but suggest a worse outcome after infection with resistant strains. Alternative options for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae are limited. Current strategies include colistin, fosfomycin, tigecycline and temocillin. Although in vitro testing suggests strong activity for each of these drugs against a large proportion of carbapenem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae, clinical evaluations do not provide strong evidence for equivalent or improved outcome. Oral treatment with fosfomycin tromethamine is effective against lower urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli. Intravenous fosfomycin may be beneficial and safe for patients when used as part of a combination therapy in the management of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Tigecycline is only indicated for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections in Europe, and is also approved for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the US. Clearly, further research on the clinical and safety outcomes in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae with these existing alternative drugs, and the development of new and unrelated drugs, are urgently warranted.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialPlasmidsAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID22191792
OpenAlexW5383056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.