ArticleDrugs & aging2012
Spotlight on eldecalcitol in osteoporosis.
Article in Drugs & aging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol for the treatment of osteoporosis.Archives of osteoporosis · 2022Pooled it
- A Novel Vitamin D Receptor Agonist, VS-105, Improves Bone Mineral Density without Affecting Serum Calcium in a Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Rat Model.Journal of exploratory research in pharmacology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Reprint of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eldecalcitol (1α,25[OH](2)-2β-(3-hydroxypropyloxy)vitamin D(3); ED-71; Edirol®) is an orally administered analogue of active vitamin D (calcitriol) that is available in Japan for the treatment of osteoporosis at a dosage of 0.75 μg/day. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial, eldecalcitol reduced markers of bone turnover significantly more than placebo. Similarly, in a randomized, double-blind comparison with the calcitriol prodrug, alfacalcidol 1.0 μg/day, eldecalcitol 0.75 μg/day produced significantly greater reductions in markers of bone turnover and had a positive effect on femoral biomechanical properties. In both trials, eldecalcitol treatment was associated with an increase in bone mineral density (BMD), whereas patients who received the comparators generally had a reduction in BMD. In the comparison with alfacalcidol, eldecalcitol significantly reduced the 3-year incidence of vertebral fractures (primary endpoint), with an absolute risk reduction of 4.1% over this period, representing a relative risk reduction of 26%. There was no significant difference in the rate of non-vertebral fractures. In both trials, increases in blood calcium (to >2.6 mmol/L) and urinary calcium (to >0.1 mmol/L glomerular filtrate) were the most clinically important treatment-emergent adverse events. In the comparison with alfacalcidol over 36 months of treatment, 21.0% and 13.5% of eldecalcitol 0.75 μg/day and alfacalcidol 1.0 μg/day recipients had increased blood calcium, whereas hypercalcaemia (defined as a serum calcium >2.9 mmol/L) occurred in 0.4% and urolithiasis in 1.3% of eldecalcitol recipients. Eldecalcitol is an efficacious treatment for patients with osteoporosis that should be further investigated in head-to-head trials with other recommended first-line pharmacological treatments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.