Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22190645›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2012

Simultaneous assessment of uptake and metabolism in rat hepatocytes: a comprehensive mechanistic model.

Karelle Ménochet, Kathryn E Kenworthy, J Brian Houston, Aleksandra Galetin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Novel method for kinetic analysis applied to transport by the uniporter OCT2.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recent developments inDrug metabolism reviews · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Establishing a systematic framework to characterise in vitro methods for human hepatic metabolic clearance.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karelle MénochetCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Kathryn E Kenworthy
J Brian Houston
Aleksandra Galetin

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kinetic parameters describing hepatic uptake in hepatocytes are frequently estimated without appropriate incorporation of bidirectional passive diffusion, intracellular binding, and metabolism. A mechanistic two-compartment model was developed to describe all of the processes occurring during the in vitro uptake experiments performed in freshly isolated rat hepatocytes plated for 2 h. Uptake of rosuvastatin, pravastatin, pitavastatin, valsartan, bosentan, telmisartan, and repaglinide was investigated over a 0.1 to 300 μM concentration range at 37°C for 2 or 45-90 min; nonspecific binding was taken into account. All concentration-time points were analyzed simultaneously by using a mechanistic two-compartment model describing uptake kinetics [unbound affinity constant (K(m,u)), maximum uptake rate (V(max)), unbound active uptake clearance (CL(active,u))], passive diffusion [unbound passive diffusion clearance (P(diff,u))], and intracellular binding [intracellular unbound fraction (fu(cell))]. When required (telmisartan and repaglinide), the model was extended to account for the metabolism [unbound metabolic clearance (CL(met,u))]. The CL(active,u) ranged 8-fold, reflecting a 11-fold range in uptake K(m,u), with telmisartan and valsartan showing the highest affinity for uptake transporters (K(m,u) <10 μM). Both P(diff,u) and fu(cell) span over two orders of magnitude and reflected the lipophilicity of the drugs in the dataset. An extended incubation time allowed steady state to be reached between media and intracellular compartment concentrations and reduced the error in certain parameter estimates observed with shorter incubation times. Active transport accounted for >70% of total uptake for all drugs investigated and was 4- and 112-fold greater than CL(met,u) for telmisartan and repaglinide, respectively. Modeling of uptake kinetics in conjunction with metabolism improved the precision of the uptake parameter estimates for repaglinide and telmisartan. Recommendations are made for uptake experimental design and modeling strategies.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBinding SitesBiological Transport, ActiveCells, CulturedDiffusionHepatocytesIntracellular FluidPharmaceutical PreparationsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID22190645
PMCPMC3310695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.