Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22190626›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2012

Motoneuronal and muscle synergies involved in cat hindlimb control during fictive and real locomotion: a comparison study.

Sergey N Markin, Michel A Lemay, Boris I Prilutsky, Ilya A Rybak

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sergey N MarkinDept. of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel Univ. College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA.
Michel A Lemay
Boris I Prilutsky
Ilya A Rybak
Drexel University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

SPINAL CIRCUITS &THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEMP01HD032571 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GOOLSBY, WILLIAM · 1995 to 2016
$16.2M
Spinal Control of Locomotion: Studies and ApplicationsR01NS048844 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI RYBAK, ILYA A · 2006 to 2010
$2.2M
CRCNS: Role of sensory feedback in locomotor recovery after spinal cord injuryR01EB012855 · NIBIB · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI LEMAY, MICHEL A · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB-012855NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB012855NICHD NIH HHS HD-032571NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS-048844NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS048844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the activity profiles and synergies of spinal motoneurons recorded during fictive locomotion evoked in immobilized decerebrate cat preparations by midbrain stimulation to the activity profiles and synergies of the corresponding hindlimb muscles obtained during forward level walking in cats. The fictive locomotion data were collected in the Spinal Cord Research Centre, University of Manitoba, and provided by Dr. David McCrea; the real locomotion data were obtained in the laboratories of M. A. Lemay and B. I. Prilutsky. Scatterplot representation and minimum spanning tree clustering algorithm were used to identify the possible motoneuronal and muscle synergies operating during both fictive and real locomotion. We found a close similarity between the activity profiles and synergies of motoneurons innervating one-joint muscles during fictive locomotion and the profiles and synergies of the corresponding muscles during real locomotion. However, the activity patterns of proximal nerves controlling two-joint muscles, such as posterior biceps and semitendinosus (PBSt) and rectus femoris (RF), were not uniform in fictive locomotion preparations and differed from the activity profiles of the corresponding two-joint muscles recorded during forward level walking. Moreover, the activity profiles of these nerves and the corresponding muscles were unique and could not be included in the synergies identified in fictive and real locomotion. We suggest that afferent feedback is involved in the regulation of locomotion via motoneuronal synergies controlled by the spinal central pattern generator (CPG) but may also directly affect the activity of motoneuronal pools serving two-joint muscles (e.g., PBSt and RF). These findings provide important insights into the organization of the spinal CPG in mammals, the motoneuronal and muscle synergies engaged during locomotion, and their afferent control.

Indexed as

AnimalsCatsDecerebrate StateHindlimbLocomotionMotor NeuronsMuscle, Skeletal

Identifiers

PMID22190626
PMCPMC3331602
OpenAlexW2110252881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.