Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22190398›Full record

Trial reportClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2012

Phase 1 study of a recombinant mutant protective antigen of Bacillus anthracis.

Joseph A Bellanti, Feng-Ying C Lin, Chiayung Chu, Joseph Shiloach, Stephen H Leppla, German A Benavides, Arthur Karpas, Mahtab Moayeri, Chunyan Guo, John B Robbins and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Role of site-directed mutagenesis and adjuvants in the stability and potency of anthrax protective antigen.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evaluation of immune response to recombinantIranian journal of veterinary research · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joseph A BellantiProgram in Developmental and Molecular Immunity, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Feng-Ying C Lin
Chiayung Chu
Joseph Shiloach
Stephen H Leppla
German A Benavides
Arthur Karpas
Mahtab Moayeri
Chunyan Guo
John B Robbins
Rachel Schneerson

Funding

Vaccines and Therapeutics for AnthraxZIAAI000929 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI LEPPLA, STEPHEN · 2009 to 2025
$15.9M
Development of vaccines to bacterial diseases found especially in childrenZIAHD008839 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI ROBBINS, JOHN · 2009 to 2012
$11.7M
Production and purification of biological compoundsZICDK015500 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI SHILOACH, JOSEPH · 2009 to 2022
$7.2M
Structure and Function of Virulence Factors of Bacillus anthracisZIAAI001031 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI LEPPLA, STEPHEN · 2009 to 2018
$6.2M
Production , purification and preparation of various candidiate vaccines ZICDK070011 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI SHILOACH, JOSEPH · 2010 to 2016
$1.9M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A phase 1 study of a recombinant mutant protective antigen (rPA) vaccine was conducted in 186 healthy adults aged 18 to 45 years. Volunteers were randomized to receive one of three formulations of rPA (formalin treated, alum adsorbed, or both), in 10- or 20-μg dosages each, or the licensed vaccine, AVA. Three injections were given at 2-month intervals and a 4th 1 year after the 3rd. Vaccinees were examined at the clinic once following each injection, at 48 to 72 h postinjection. Adverse reactions were recorded in diaries for 7 days. Sera were collected before each injection and 1 week after the 1st, 2 weeks after the 3rd and 4th, and 1 year after the 4th. Serum anti-PA IgG was assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and toxin neutralization assay (TNA). All formulations at both dosages were safe and immunogenic, inducing booster responses, with the highest antibody levels following the 4th injection (354 to 732 μg/ml). The lowest levels were induced by the formalin-only-treated rPA; there was no statistical difference between levels induced by alum-adsorbed and formalin-treated/alum-adsorbed rPA or by the two dosages. The antibody levels declined in all groups during the 1-year intervals after the 3rd and 4th injections but less so during the 2nd year, after the 4th injection (fold decreases were 10 to 25 versus 3.4 to 7.0, P < 0.001). There were too few AVA recipients for statistical comparisons, but their antibody levels followed those of rPA. Anti-rPA measured by ELISA correlated with TNA titers (r = 0.97). These data support studying alum-adsorbed rPA in children.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdolescentAdultAnthraxAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialAntibody FormationAntigens, BacterialBacillus anthracisBacterial ToxinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, SyntheticAdjuvants, Immunologicanthrax toxinAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial ToxinsRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID22190398
PMCPMC3272932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.