Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22190166›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2012

Efficacy of a two-tiered trauma team activation protocol in a Norwegian trauma centre.

M Rehn, H M Lossius, K E Tjosevik, M Vetrhus, O Østebø, T Eken, Rogaland Trauma System Study Collaborating Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00876564 (Trauma System Evolution. A Quality Improvement Study of the Trauma System at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway.), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00876564 nacompletednot on this map

Trauma System Evolution. A Quality Improvement Study of the Trauma System at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian Air Ambulance FoundationRan2009 to 2010Enrolled1,812ConditionsTraumaArmsTrauma patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Adult trauma centers in Poland: where do we stand?International journal of emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Adherence to national trauma triage criteria in Norway: a cross-sectional study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Elevated serum lactate levels and age are associated with an increased risk for severe injury in trauma team activation due to trauma mechanism.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  9. ISS alone, is not sufficient to correctly assign patients post hoc to trauma team requirement.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Trauma-team-activation in Germany: how do emergency service professionals use the activation due to trauma mechanism? Results from a nationwide survey.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Mortality of trauma patients treated at trauma centers compared to non-trauma centers in Sweden: a retrospective study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Validation of the Korean criteria for trauma team activation.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2018
    Article
  16. Evaluating the ability of a trauma team activation tool to identify severe injury: a multicentre cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018
    Observational
  17. Observational
  18. A criteria-directed protocol for in-hospital triage of trauma patients.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2018
    Article
  19. Evaluation of a trauma team activation protocol revision: a prospective cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M RehnDepartment of Research, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway. marius.rehn@norskluftambulanse.no
H M Lossius
K E Tjosevik
M Vetrhus
O Østebø
T Eken
Rogaland Trauma System Study Collaborating Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA registry-based analysis revealed imprecise informal one-tiered trauma team activation (TTA) in a primary trauma centre. A two-tiered TTA protocol was introduced and analysed to examine its impact on triage precision and resource utilization.

methodsInterhospital transfers and patients admitted by non-healthcare personnel were excluded. Undertriage was defined as the fraction of major trauma victims (New Injury Severity Score over 15) admitted without TTA. Overtriage was the fraction of TTA without major trauma.

resultsOf 1812 patients, 768 had major trauma. Overall undertriage was reduced from 28·4 to 19·1 per cent (P < 0·001) after system revision. Overall overtriage increased from 61·5 to 71·6 per cent, whereas the mean number of skilled hours spent per overtriaged patient was reduced from 6·5 to 3·5 (P < 0·001) and the number of skilled hours spent per major trauma victim was reduced from 7·4 to 7·1 (P < 0·001). Increasing age increased risk for undertriage and decreased risk for overtriage. Falls increased risk for undertriage and decreased risk for overtriage, whereas motor vehicle-related accidents showed the opposite effects. Patients triaged to a prehospital response involving an anaesthetist had less chance of both undertriage and overtriage.

conclusionA two-tiered TTA protocol was associated with reduced undertriage and increased overtriage, while trauma team resource consumption was reduced. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00876564 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

AdultAnesthesiologyClinical ProtocolsEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayOdds RatioPatient Care TeamProspective StudiesTrauma CentersTriageWorkforceWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID22190166
PMCPMC3412315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.