Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22190022›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2012

Iron depletion and repletion with ferrous sulfate or electrolytic iron modifies the composition and metabolic activity of the gut microbiota in rats.

Alexandra Dostal, Christophe Chassard, Florentine M Hilty, Michael B Zimmermann, Tanja Jaeggi, Samuela Rossi, Christophe Lacroix

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03866837 (Prebiotic GOS and Lactoferrin for Beneficial Gut Microbiota With Iron Supplements), which is not on this map. Cited by 121 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03866837 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Prebiotic GOS and Lactoferrin for Beneficial Gut Microbiota With Iron Supplements

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled288ConditionsIron-deficiencyArmsGalacto-oligosaccharides, Bovine lactoferrin, Multiple micronutrient powders with 5 mg iron
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 213 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Why Do FilamentousAnnual review of microbiology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra DostalInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christophe Chassard
Florentine M Hilty
Michael B Zimmermann
Tanja Jaeggi
Samuela Rossi
Christophe Lacroix
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

The effect of iron fortification of complementary foods on infant gut microbiotaU01HD064921 · NICHD · SWISS FEDERAL INST OF TECH (ETH ZURICH) · PI ZIMMERMANN, MICHAEL BRUCE · 2009 to 2011
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD064921NICHD NIH HHS U01HD064921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron (Fe) deficiency anemia is a global health concern and Fe fortification and supplementation are common corrective strategies. Fe is essential not only for the human host but also for nearly all gut bacteria. We studied the impact of Fe deficiency and Fe repletion on the gut microbiota in rats. Weanling rats were fed an Fe-deficient diet for 24 d and then repleted for 13 d with FeSO₄ (n = 15) or electrolytic Fe (n = 14) at 10 and 20 mg Fe · kg diet⁻¹. In addition, one group of rats (n = 8) received the Fe-deficient diet and one group (n = 3) received a Fe-sufficient control diet for all 37 d. Fecal samples were collected at baseline and after the depletion and repletion periods, and colonic tissues were examined histologically. Microbial metabolite composition in cecal water was measured and fecal samples were analyzed for microbial composition with temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis and qPCR. Compared to Fe-sufficient rats, Fe-deficient rats had significantly lower concentrations of cecal butyrate (-87%) and propionate (-72%) and the abundance of dominant species was strongly modified, including greater numbers of lactobacilli and Enterobacteriaceae and a large significant decrease of the Roseburia spp./E. rectale group, a major butyrate producer. Repletion with 20 mg FeSO₄ · kg diet⁻¹ significantly increased cecal butyrate concentrations and partially restored bacterial populations compared to Fe-deficient rats at endpoint. The effects on the gut microbiota were stronger in rats repleted with FeSO₄ than in rats repleted with electrolytic Fe, suggesting ferrous Fe may be more available for utilization by the gut microbiota than elemental Fe. Repletion with FeSO₄ significantly increased neutrophilic infiltration of the colonic mucosa compared to Fe-deficient rats. In conclusion, Fe depletion and repletion strongly affect the composition and metabolic activity of rat gut microbiota.

Indexed as

Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyAnimal FeedAnimalsBacteriaBody WeightCecumChromatography, High Pressure LiquidColonDietFecesFerrous CompoundsHemoglobinsIronIron, DietaryMaleRatsFerrous Compoundsferrous sulfateHemoglobinsIronIron, Dietary

Identifiers

PMID22190022
PMCPMC3260059
OpenAlexW2135418522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.